Search for: "Stevens v. Stevens" Results 2481 - 2500 of 10,120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2008, 12:52 pm
The Supreme Court this week handed down a decision in Winters v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:44 am
 In the aftermath of Edwards v Cook, a number of patentees have successfully deployed creative arguments to avoid falling foul of an “Edwards v Cook”-style attack. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 10:46 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
In 2020, the Florida Supreme Court affirmed the state’s stringent statute of limitations on civil sexual assault cases in the matter of  R.R. v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 3:07 am
" Justice Stevens wrote for the majority, rejecting a dictionary definition of "during," using instead the "most natural reading" of the statute. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:21 am
" He also pointed out that a majority does not join Justice Stevens' piecemeal view of lenity, so the decision "does not hold that the outcome is different when contrary legislative history does exist. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:00 pm
S. 942 (2007) (STEVENS, J., joined by GINSBURG, J., respecting denial of certiorari); Beard v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:34 am
Citing the Court's opinion earlier this Term in Burton v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 4:36 pm
Williams 202 days 7-2 3; Scalia(m), Stevens(c), Souter(d) US v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 6:51 am by texasbar
John Albach's "End of the World" contributions that appeared in the January 2000 column spawned two contributions of unusual, but very "nice" contract provisions:(1) From Jack Hazlewood of Amarillo, who years ago "happened to stumble on to Roy Rogers' contract with his movie studio (or maybe his agent)" in Nichols Encyclopedia of Legal Forms, this clause buried "deep in the fine print":Actor [Roy Rogers] shall never in performance to which he is… [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:59 am by texasbar
John Albach's "End of the World" contributions that appeared in the January 2000 column spawned two contributions of unusual, but very "nice" contract provisions:(1) From Jack Hazlewood of Amarillo, who years ago "happened to stumble on to Roy Rogers' contract with his movie studio (or maybe his agent)" in Nichols Encyclopedia of Legal Forms, this clause buried "deep in the fine print":Actor [Roy Rogers] shall never in performance to which he is… [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:38 am by Erin Miller
 Justice Stevens dissents alone. [read post]