Search for: "Still v. Justice Court"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 20,312
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2011, 2:22 pm
A complex case, certainly, but Justice Watt always constructs his decisions in a very readable and organized manner.R. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 6:31 am
SCOTUS at long last decided Kiobel v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:39 am
Robert Barnes of the Washington Post reports on the “very different views of the criminal justice system” taken by Justices Alito and Sotomayor, the Court’s two former prosecutors and “two of the court’s most outspoken members on criminal justice issues. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:59 am
Here's a bit: The high-profile Supreme Court decisions announced each year in late June tend to reinforce a narrative—one that, to be clear, is false—that the Court’s justices are merely partisan actors and that all significant cases divide them into strictly political camps. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 5:02 pm
Justice Wiley accepts (as he must) the plaintiff's version of the facts on the Court of Appeal's review of the demurrer. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
In 2019, when the Supreme Court granted cert in Emulex v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 7:23 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court’s opinion in State v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:08 am
If you're still reading this post, then you should read the article. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:40 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices DeWine, Fischer, French, and Kennedy* No: Chief Justice O’Connor, Justices Donnelly and Stewart *Justice Kennedy would accept the appeal on all propositions. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Indeed, the Supreme Court in Vieth v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The OCC’s submission was that the duty to trace “is still a component of the search for a durable solution, that is, one which will last beyond their 18th birthday” [67] (v). [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:31 am
JUSTICE KENNEDY: But I still would like to know your position. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
Not a single justice thought that state courts could hear allegations of "fraud on the FDA. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 7:12 pm
This, of course, is a very different holding and standard than the New York Court of Appeals had set forth in People v Ford (86 NY2d 397) in which the Court held that while it is ineffective assistance to affirmatively give bad advice on the immigration consequences, attorneys need not say anything. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 7:39 pm
Acknowledging the benefits often realized through ADR, as well as the overarching goal of justice systems to facilitate justice, she concludes that: “ADR is here to stay, and that is a good thing. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:03 am
The federal courts abandoned the jurisdictional rule in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 4:50 am
Pundits had expected that the Court’s grant of certiorari in Sutter – in combination with the Justices’ comments at oral argument – signaled its intention to follow its 2010 decision in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Justice Scalia wrote Whitman v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 9:29 am
Eventually, the Supreme Court decided to review the case; it decided in 2012 (Salazar v. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 7:25 am
Dennis Crouch Following my recent post examining the Edwards v. [read post]
