Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Maple Drive Farms v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 6:52 am
Adjmi v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
It occasionally happens that an important case comes along for which there isn't an available Kat to write a blog-post. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 12:52 am
Bearing this in mind, Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM, Carolus C. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 10:23 am
Section 230 The plaintiffs also alleged that Ripoff Report’s Corporate Advocacy Program violated Massachusetts consumer protection law. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 10:16 am
Untruthful Promotion First up is Byrnes v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:38 pm
The WFOE’s English name will be unofficial and is, for the most part, up to you. 9. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:56 pm
The Justices, taking up the case of Michigan v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:32 am
While the characterization as a platform is consequential to the employee/independent contractor analysis, it will likely come up again in another scenario that will affect the ability of these companies to push back on consumer personal injury claims: the viability of Section 230 as a defense. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 7:31 am
While “public concern” wasn’t always the crucial metric for whether speech is entitled to protection, it plays some part and even a central role in public employee cases. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
For instance, a well plead Virginia Consumer Protection Act claim will survive a dismissal challenge. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:16 am
Wilson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:15 am
” Google v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:10 am
This invitation for action is perhaps unsurprising as data protection and consumer-focused regulators have been saying for some time now that product manufacturers have a crucial role to play in maintaining consumer privacy rights and ensuring compliance with data privacy laws. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 6:44 am
Reid v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 6:35 am
” She writes: I was brought up to believe that following the law isn’t optional. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
Never too late 35 [week ending Sunday 1 March] – EPO v SUEPO | Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd | UK IPO on EPO | Scents and copyright | GIs under scrutiny | UPC test-drive | Is UK failing to protect innovation? [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:09 pm
Since then Listeria has been implicated in many outbreaks of food-borne illness, most commonly from exposure to contaminated dairy products and prepared meat products, including turkey and deli meats, pâté, hot dogs and seafood and fish. [4] Given its widespread presence in the environment and food supply, the ingestion of Listeria has been described as an “exceedingly common occurrence. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
Moreover, oversight of patent protection by the Court of Justice will be impossible. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
Wonderful Katfriend Alberto Bellan, in his 36th weekly round-up of the previous week's IPKat blogposts, has shown that only three out of a total of 19 posts concerned the EPO, and 13 weren't really anything to do with patents at all. [read post]
