Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. " Results 2481 - 2500 of 8,925
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 4:58 pm by Natalma M. McKnew
This history of the non-compete is as old as the United States itself. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 9:00 pm by Lesley Wexler
The Convention on Conventional Weapons Protocol V (on Explosive Remnants of War) also regulates US use of cluster munitions, as it is a state party to this international treaty. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:40 pm by Philip Favro
United States, asserting that the message reflected discussions about litigation strategy between a company engineer and in-house counsel. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 8:18 am by Moria Miller
By Nicole Greenstein C’14Professors Lillian BeVier, Theodore Ruger and Arlen SpecterOn Monday, November 21, a crowd of students and faculty convened in Penn Law’s Gittis Hall for a debate on the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 5:29 am by Joel R. Brandes
Respondent Shannon Harless was a citizen of the United States of America and a legal permanent resident of France. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:26 am by Robin Mashal
Mashal has been admitted to the State Bar of California and the Bar of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
If such a device existed, it would have broken on Thursday, when the government gave its closing argument in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 8:44 am by Peter Margulies
As a result, immigrants subject to the MPP will typically not be released into the United States. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
Lynch, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, and Robert J. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 7:20 am
" Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO, District 2-13 v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 7:20 am
" Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO, District 2-13 v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Indeed, abolitionists have good reason to fear such a reaction given what happened several decades ago in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 4:41 am
 In an email Kidde sent inNovember 2010, [he] stated he could no longer work with Bergstein because Bank of America had put him on ChexSystems, which prevented him from opening a bank account anywhere in the United States. [read post]