Search for: "Unit, Inc., Appeal of" Results 2481 - 2500 of 13,890
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2020, 3:39 pm by Larry
This time, the decision is Lockhart Textiles Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 10:30 am by Magdaleen Jooste
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision that certain claims of Nike, Inc. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 6:43 am by Florence Campbell Jones
The first tier is comprised of the Justices of the Peace (giudici di pace) and the Courts or Tribunals (tribunali), the second tier of the Courts of Appeal (corte d’appello)  and the third of the Supreme Court (corte di cassazione), which has overall competence and final instance. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 4:15 am by Christopher Hall
Synchronoss Technologies, Inc., decided June 19, 2020, is a relevant recent (albeit nonprecedential) ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that serves as a useful case study on what worked and went well and what didn’t for both plaintiff and defendant in a Section 101 case. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:15 am by IPWatchdog
Supreme Court denied certiorari to Chrimar Systems, Inc., thereby letting stand a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and declining to consider the controversial issues of “when a judicial decision becomes binding on the parties, and whether a decree from a different branch of government can reverse an Article III court judgment. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:15 am by IPWatchdog
Supreme Court denied certiorari to Chrimar Systems, Inc., thereby letting stand a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and declining to consider the controversial issues of “when a judicial decision becomes binding on the parties, and whether a decree from a different branch of government can reverse an Article III court judgment. [read post]
On June 16, 2020, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published a final rule revising patent term adjustment under 35 U.S.C. 154(b) in view of Supernus Pharm., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:20 am by Cameron Kerry, John B Morris, Jr.
Editor’s Note: This article is part of a three-part Lawfare series on how to address federal privacy legislation in the United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 6:42 am by Beth Graham
After the Supreme Court issued its opinion, the case was remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 5:01 am by Hilary Hurd
Most famously, in Capital Cities/ABC, Inc. v. [read post]