Search for: "United States v. Breyer"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 3,533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2011, 10:15 am
Guy on the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:58 am
United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 1:57 pm
Assuming the request is denied, audio of the oral argument will be available on the Supreme Court's website (HERE), which states: The audio recordings of all oral arguments heard by the Supreme Court of the United States is available to the public at the end of each argument week. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:58 pm
Breyer warns, is that if the government wins the Jones case, “then there is nothing to prevent the police or the government from monitoring 24 hours a day the public movement of every citizen of the United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:17 pm
Justice Breyer summed up these fears by stating, "...if you win this case then there is nothing to prevent the police or the government from monitoring 24 hours a day the public movement of every citizen of the United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:34 am
Breyer's dissent from the U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:50 am
The Supreme Court heard argument on November 7 in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:50 am
The Supreme Court heard argument on November 7 in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:35 am
Last year, in State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:22 pm
While the majority of the court seemed to agree that the United State government violated the Fourth Amendment, the problem is U.S. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:23 pm
Others much more qualified than I have analyzed the debate, so see these folks for much meatier, more lawyerly analyses:Orin Kerr, Volokh Conspiracy: "Reflections on the Oral Argument in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am
” The Court also heard oral arguments yesterday in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 5:43 pm
Justice Breyer today said to counsel for the Government: “if you win this case, then there is nothing to prevent the police or the government from monitoring 24 hours a day the public movement of every citizen of the United States.” And that, Justice Breyer said, “sounds like ‘1984.’ ” ScotusBlog has this recap of the arguments. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:12 am
Breyer told the government lawyer that, “if you win this case, then there is nothing to prevent the police or the government from monitoring 24 hours a day the public movements of every citizen of the United States….What happened in the past [with traditional surveillance] is memories are fallible, computers aren’t….So, if you win, you suddenly produce what sounds like 1984″ — or so, Breyer said, the other side was arguing. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:55 am
(Orin Kerr) I was at the Supreme Court this morning for the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 11:25 am
Here's Samuel Alito, that's Associate Justice Samuel Alito of the Supreme Court of the United States, explaining the problem.The petition in this case concerns bizarre and objectionable testimony given by a “defense expert” at the penalty phase of Buck’s capital trial. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 11:25 am
Here's Samuel Alito, that's Associate Justice Samuel Alito of the Supreme Court of the United States, explaining the problem.The petition in this case concerns bizarre and objectionable testimony given by a “defense expert” at the penalty phase of Buck’s capital trial. [read blog]
6 Nov 2011, 10:35 am
Californiaappealed that decision to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:26 am
Briggs (1986) and Kalina v. [read post]
