Search for: "United States v. Holder" Results 2481 - 2500 of 4,280
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am by Rachel Sachs
Other coverage continued to focus on some of the other amicus briefs filed in Hollingsworth and United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
First, the administration contends that the United States is in a state of armed conflict with Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:20 am by Benjamin Wittes
A similar dynamic occurred in the First Amendment context in 2010’s Holder v. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 11:30 pm by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in Memphis, Tennessee, his application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 1:17 am by Florian Mueller
Robart, clearly a thought leader and pioneer among U.S. federal judges with respect to FRAND, in the Microsoft v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:11 am by Marissa Miller
United States, in which the Justices will consider whether the Federal Tort Claims Act allows a prison inmate to sue the government for an alleged sexual assault committed by guards at a federal prison. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:46 am by Anubha Sinha
 In a 2011 letter to Hillary Clinton, United States Senator Orrin Hatch opposed the Fund’s pro generic drugs procurement policy. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am by Cormac Early
 In his Verdict column for Justia, Vikram David Amar analyzes the issue of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG)’s standing in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:58 am by Kevin Tottis
Supreme Court Punts on Costco First Sale Copyright CaseUnited States Supreme Court issued a non-decision in the matter of Costco Wholesale Corporation v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:55 pm by Ryan Emenaker
Yet, out of the 89,476 jurisdictions in the United States, only about 12,000 (13.4%) are “covered” jurisdictions. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:53 pm by Florian Mueller
It's about nothing less than the ability of Apple and other patent holders to win permanent injunctions in the United States against direct competitors infringing some of their patents. [read post]