Search for: "Waters v. United States" Results 2481 - 2500 of 4,952
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2015, 9:18 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-419. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 6:29 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Travel over domestic waters is travel within the United States, considering it to include its territorial waters. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:26 am by SOG Staff
  Earlier this week the United States Supreme Court held in Hurst v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:26 am by SOG Staff
  Earlier this week the United States Supreme Court held in Hurst v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:38 am by Aaron Nielson
Because it disproportionately hears lawsuits involving the United States, it often wades into the “famously murky” waters of the political-question doctrine, as well as the equally murky doctrines of standing, final agency action, and ripeness and mootness. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The Association began gathering water quality samples, determining that the water entering the fairgrounds site from upstream was of lower quality than the water leaving the site. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:26 am by Amy Howe
The state points to the two earlier versions of the order, which targeted Muslim countries, as well as comments and tweets made by the president calling for a ban on the entry of Muslims into the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am by Katherine Gallo
Co. (1933, Mont.) 26 P2d 175 [periodic immersion of injured hand into hot water]; United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (1919 Neb.) 173 NW 689 [x-ray procedure requiring injection of contrast substance into the kidney]; Cardinal v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
The defendants were convicted of criminal violations of the Clean Water Act and ordered to pay $250,000 in restitution and placed on five years of probation.In United States of America v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
It thus effectively overruled State v. [read post]