Search for: "Works v. State" Results 2481 - 2500 of 61,617
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2011, 4:31 am by Andrew Smith, Matrix Chambers.
Art 7 of the WTD obliges member states to ensure that workers are entitled to four weeks’ annual leave; the central question for the Supreme Court to determine in this case is whether the overall pattern of the claimants’ work cycle amounted to compliance with this requirement. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 6:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
Paragraph L delineated Respondent's right to travel to New York for work reasons and stateed that Petitioner "authorizes temporary transfers of his wife to  New York or to the United States generally for work reasons and for certain periods of time limited to the execution of the work itself ... [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:32 pm
This question is especially timely in light of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Philip Morris v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
In 2010, Judge Brookman received the Director’s Award from United States Attorney General Eric Holder, in Washington, DC, for superior performance as an Assistant United States Attorney, for his work on the United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am by Eric Goldman
He then worked to boost the posts’ visibility, including: the posts asked users to “follow [his] link and mark it as helpful so that the message is amplified and as many people are warned as possible. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
That the United States Supreme Court decided to hear the case of King v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 1:17 pm
Counsel's explanation for his apparent total abandonment of his law practice (he had some leg surgeries) didn't really work for me. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 10:59 am by Leiza Dolghih
Leiza DolghihAttorney, Godwin Lewis PC The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals started the new year with a quick civil procedure lesson, ruling yesterday in Vantage Drilling Company v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 10:51 am by Sheppard Mullin
In granting the Defendant’s motion, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York held that plaintiff failed to state a claim because she did not to set forth “any approximation of the number of unpaid overtime hours worked . . . or any approximation of the amount of wages due. [read post]