Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 3,267
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2011, 4:17 am
[T]here will be no right or authority for any dispute to be brought, heard or arbitrated under this Policy as a class or collective action, private attorney general, or in a representative capacity on behalf of any person. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 3:53 pm
In addition, the employer will generally be liable also for the plaintiff(s) "reasonable" attorney's fees and costs, and, possibly, for additional penalties. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:38 am
The Supreme Court gave us a partial answer in Arkansas Dept. of Health and Human Servs. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 5:15 pm
Our Oak Brook, Illinois consumer rights private law firm handles individual and class action predatory lending, unfair debt collection, lemon law and other consumer fraud cases that government agencies and public interest law firms such as the Illinois Attorney General may not pursue. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:09 am
G.D. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 12:23 pm
The California Attorney General's Office, which is defending CARB in this matter, is considering filing an objection but has not commented further. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
., removed from the United States because of his participation in Nazi-sponsored acts of persecution while serving during World War II as an armed member of the Ukrainian Auxiliary Police (UAP) in Nazi-occupied L'viv, Ukraine, announced Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:36 pm
Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:01 am
The complaint alleges the transfers at issue were previously approved by a number of superior courts. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:27 am
In a decision filed January 26, 2011 (Ceron v. 321 Henderson Receivables), a California Court of Appeals has unanimously affirmed one portion of a California Superior Court judgment sustaining demurrers by J.G. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:20 am
The Federal Court of Canada upheld the award, concluding: “[t]here is no dispute that the Canadian ban on PCB exports sought to protect the Canadian companies from U.S. competition and was not for a legitimate environmental purpose”: Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
BC410890) APPEAL from an order and a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael L. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:24 am
{The same criticism applies to the Maine Superior Court’s conclusion that a ban on gun possession in public housing is constitutional. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
Specifically, In Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 12:58 pm
Ruel Russell, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, DOCKET NO. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:01 am
Supreme Court noted long ago in Grigsby v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:38 am
He noted that the language at the top generally precluded relief on any claim decided on the merits by the state court, and the numbered paragraphs are two exceptions to that general rule. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
Superior Court (2007) 152 Cal.App.4th 137, 163 (Wimsatt).) [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:56 pm
CGC-05-447044 (Kullar)), Echeverria, represented by the same attorneys, had filed a partially overlapping putative class action against Foot Locker and others in the Alameda County Superior Court (Echeverria v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 8:05 pm
Court Rules, comment 6.1 to R. 2:5-1(f)(1); Campagna v. [read post]
