Search for: "Clarence T."
Results 2501 - 2520
of 3,444
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2021, 12:59 pm
“But the free speech clause doesn’t dictate what words an elected body can use to reprimand one of its members,” Morris asserted. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:24 pm
” The Supreme Court did not disagree; Ginsburg noted that “[t]he party presentation principle is supple, not ironclad. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:27 am
Constituents in these states don’t want obstruction, so senators risk paying a political price if they delay or deny confirmation, Severino said. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 5:52 pm
Why don’t they just sue at home, Alito asked David Frederick, representing the EU. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 3:50 pm
The debate on this contentious issue won’t be settled today. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:37 am
Justices Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas joined almost all of the Roberts decision. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:24 am
For The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Brent Kendall and Jess Bravin report that Justice Clarence Thomas’ “emergence during the court’s telephonic hearings served notice that he remains an active, if idiosyncratic, participant in the court’s deliberations. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 3:28 pm
For example, consider Justice Clarence Thomas’ notorious silence during oral arguments. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:47 pm
In an opinion written by Justice Clarence Thomas, the Court ruled that they could not: because federal regulations cover what gets put on drug labels for generic drugs, the manufacturers of generic drugs cannot be sued for damages under state laws for failing to warn of possible risks. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 7:30 am
If Clarence Thomas remains on the Court until the retirement age of his predecessor, he will have served for forty years. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:01 am
Scalia was joined in full or in part in both dissents by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
22 May 2017, 1:16 pm
And if it was, can the state show that it had “good reasons” to believe that it would violate the Voting Rights Act if it didn’t use race to draw the districts? [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
Silberman, Clarence D. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 1:39 am
Silberman, Clarence D. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 10:56 am
“Why are you conceding that Arizona can’t go a whit beyond” what the federal regulation do? [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 4:00 pm
Other cases that don’t directly deal with race are far from race-neutral. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:34 pm
The argument had still not focused explicitly on what the statutory term “obtained” in Section 853(a) does or doesn’t mean. [read post]
18 May 2018, 10:33 am
“So if you ask me to write something better than Marks, I don’t know what to say,” Breyer admitted. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am
At The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports that “Justice Clarence Thomas issued a solo opinion Tuesday urging his colleagues on the Supreme Court to consider making it easier for public figures to sue news organizations. [read post]
3 May 2022, 3:51 am
Those are the women who had a right because the Supreme Court said so, and now don’t, because a different Supreme Court said so. [read post]
