Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 2501 - 2520 of 12,895
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Second, issues arising out of the case of Prudential Assurance Company Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2018] UKSC 39. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:24 am by Russell Knight
The left hand columns, boxes a,b,c,d,e and f, include the employee and the employer’s information. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:47 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The employer responded that, in order to return to work, the employee needed to provide a medical note confirming that he could perform regular duties and would need to choose between working “(a) in the Plastics Department on dayshift; (b) in the Riveting Department on day shift; or (c) in the Bending Department either day or afternoon shift” (at para 21), with the work in the Plastics Department being the lightest. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 5:09 pm by Brian Casillas
  The ABC test presumes workers are employees, and not independent contractors, unless the employer can establish that: A) the company does not control or direct what the worker does, either by contract or in actual practice; B) the worker performs tasks outside of the hiring entity’s usual course of business; and C) the worker is engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business. [read post]
For more information see: https://www.farmprogress.com/water/newsoms-veto-friant-kern-canal-funds-rankles-groups B. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As Martin Lederman and I argue in an amicus brief, the key to the 2012 ruling was that Congress gave people a choice: (a) obtain insurance or (b) pay extra money in taxes. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 3:54 pm by Michael Leake and David Gao
Real Estate (3d ed. 2000) Deeds of Trust, Section 10:206, p. 660 (Miller & Starr)). [2] California Civil Code Sections 2924f(b)(8)(A), 2924m(c)(3)-(4). [3] California Civil Code Section 2924m(a)(3) [4] California Civil Code Sections 2924m(a)(1)(A)-(B), 2924m(a)(3)(B). [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 11:36 am by A.J. Jackson and Jay Ramsey
  For example, if a parent company operates under two gendered hair dye brands, could the brands sell similarly crafted dye for women at a higher price than for men, or would that constitute a violation by the company under Section 391-U? [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 6:00 am by Mike Delikat
Additionally, the amendments revise Rule 14a-8(c), which prohibits shareholders from submitting more than one proposal annually. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
Kolmar opposed Wormser’s designation as CEO because it believed he was competing against PTP through his separately owned company. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 2:44 am by Patrick Bourke and Stuart Neely (UK)
On 26 October 2020, the European Commission (the Commission) launched a public consultation[1] on sustainable corporate governance (the Consultation), soliciting responses from stakeholders on a possible EU sustainable corporate governance initiative with the aim of ensuring “that environmental and social interests are embedded in business strategies”. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Thursday 12 November, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Triple Point Technology Inc v PTT Public Company Ltd. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 5:23 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/503(c)(1)(b) Transmutation of a non-marital house into a marital house is almost always done in two ways: 1) the parties put the non-marital property in both of their names or 2) the parties enter into a joint mortgage in regards to the non-marital house. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 1:22 pm by Barsumian Injury Law
An inviter is subject to liability for physical harm caused to its invitees by a condition on land if it (a) knows or by the exercise of reasonable care would discover the condition, and should realize that it involves an unreasonable risk of harm to such invitees; (b) should expect that they will not discover or realize the danger, or will fail to protect themselves against it, and (c) fails to exercise reasonable care to protect them against the danger. [read post]