Search for: "Cooper v. United States" Results 2501 - 2520 of 3,928
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Its purpose is to "monitor, investigate, and submit to congress an annual report on the national security implications of the bilateral trade and economic relationship between the United States and the People’s Republic of China, and to provide recommendations, where appropriate, to Congress for legislative and administrative action. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:44 am by Russell Knight
United States, 417 US 85 – Supreme Court 1974 Even a third-party to the third-party preventing compliance with a subpoena can result in a contempt finding. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 9:27 pm
United States (1973-1 Trade Cases ¶74,373) was inapplicable, the court added. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Anderson
Kennedy stated that he reveres Marshall as “one of the greatest jurists not only in the history of the United States, but in the history of the world. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:03 pm by Big Tent Democrat
The Supreme Court asked the United States for its view on whether cert should be granted on the questions the NFL wanted answered. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 7:22 am by emagraken
  That aspect concerns the plaintiff lawyers’ arrangements to fee-split with assisting lawyers who are based in the United States. [60]         The case law regarding Canadian counsel cooperating in class proceedings with lawyers based in the United States is evolving. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:46 pm by Patricia Hughes
The Supreme Court of the United States recently stayed injunctions against implementing the rule. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
These four people and their collaborators executed an electoral 9-11 against the United States, with the cooperation and collusion of the media and the Democrat Party and China. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:02 am by Eugene Volokh
In addition, the United States seeks back pay, compensatory damages and reinstatement for Ms. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
Texas Reg’l Planning Comm’n, 516 S.W.3d 483 (Tex. 2016) by relieving SARA of the obligations it had under a cooperative agreement between five local governments when the cooperative agreement clearly states the project would be constructed by a third-party contractor and not SARA? [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 6:18 am
States are encouraged to develop multilateral cooperation to enhance their respective abilities to comply with the multilateral normative obligations specified in Article 10. [read post]
27 Oct 2024, 6:50 am by jonathanturley
There is a vast difference between the United States sending a combat unit across the border and manufacturers who supply distributors who serve dealers who sell lawful products to consumers. [read post]