Search for: "Does 1-54" Results 2501 - 2520 of 3,421
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
Simms does not offer any evidence that he did not tell the truth in his colloquy with the court. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
Simms does not offer any evidence that he did not tell the truth in his colloquy with the court. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:09 pm
As he was quoted in Episcopal Life on July 1, 2004:Kurt Barnes, the church’s new treasurer, said the facts had won over the skeptics. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The patent under consideration was opposed on the grounds of lack of novelty (in particular over A 54(2) document D1 and A 54(3) document D4). [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 8:55 pm
" 1:23:54 — Romney, are you in the Tea Party? [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 6:00 am by Mandelman
State Bar (1960) 54 Cal.2d 659, 7 Cal.Rptr. 746, 355 P.2d 490. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
Here is another textbook example of a disclaimer that does not fulfil the requirements established in G 1/03.The patent proprietor filed an appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division to revoke the opposed patent.The Board found the (main) request I to lack novelty over document D1 (prior art under A 54(3)(4)), and auxiliary requests II and III not to comply with A 123(2). [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This explains the broad wording of answer 1 in decision G 1/03, which does not use a narrow term such as “embodiment”. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:50 pm by The Legal Blog
"  Similarly, Rule 14(1) and 14(3) also deal with the acts which an agent can undertake. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The applicant filed an appeal against the decision of the Examining Division (ED) to refuse its application.The Board found the main and the first and second auxiliary requests to lack novelty over document D1.It then dealt with the third auxiliary request, claim 1 of which read:1. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Law and Contemporary Problems, ForthcomingBarbara Black University of Cincinnati - College of Law Date Posted: August 1, 2011Accepted Paper Series36 downloadsAbstract: Ever since the U.S. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:28 am by Bexis
Jack Weinberg, who rarely does things the same way as any other judge. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
As a company progresses through later rounds of funding, that definition does not seem to work that well. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:03 am by Robert_Brazil
Effective July 1, 2011, entrepreneurs in Vermont have a new business entity to consider when determining how to set up shop. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:10 am by Bill Raftery
Mississippi HB 54 Establishes rebuttable presumption defendant presents a risk of flight if not lawfully admitted to the United States. [read post]