Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 6,454
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2011, 9:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 5:21 am
From a page called "Human Dignity & the Sanctity of Life, we learn: John McCain believes Roe v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 1:59 am
In People v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 1:59 am
In People v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 3:31 pm
Au contraire - at issue in Zuni Public School District v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:00 am
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 10:02 am
No problem, here is the 124th edition of Never Too Early For Christmas References Never Too Late.Festive Feline Level 100Rocket in the Patents Court: Napp Pharmaceutical v Dr Reddy's and SandozThe case of Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited v (1) Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited (2) Sandoz Limited [2016] EWCA Civ 1053 was previously reported on the IPKat here (first instance) and here (interim application). [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 10:21 am
The three-part test for breach of confidence set out in the English case of "Coco v AN Clark (Engineers) Ltd" [1969] RPC 41 is well known to common-law practitioners. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:45 am
The court’s reasoning began with the well-known tripartite test for breach of confidence found in the English case of Coco v A N Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1969] RPC 41, namely (as paraphrased by the court in LVM) that:(a) “the information must possess the quality of confidentiality;(b) the information must have been imparted in circumstances importing an obligation of confidence; and (c) there must have been some unauthorised use of that information to the detriment of… [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 am
In Nightlight Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
V. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
V. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 5:56 am
App. 245 (2015) and Palomer v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm
If an individual has an English reputation then it is difficult to see why he or she should not be allowed to vindicate it in the English courts. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 5:34 am
Montanile v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
It follows the May 2021 ruling of the District Court of The Hague in Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:52 am
The seminal decision, Petruis v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:40 pm
On January 14, 2011, the Federal Circuit is scheduled to hear oral argument in Qimonda AG v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 2:20 pm
Mitsubishi Chemical Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 12:41 pm
Stanford student JP Schnapper-Casteras discusses oral argument in Boyle v. [read post]
