Search for: "European Patent Office" Results 2501 - 2520 of 4,480
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2014, 12:43 am
In 27 June 2012 the European Patent Office’s Opposition Division upheld EP 172 inamended form, amending claim 1 by deleting the words “or gel” so that the claim was only for liquid and not for gel laundry detergents. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
If this is true, tarnishment isn’t a part of TM law; it’s doing something else.Bently: on the assumption of nationwide scope—the mechanics of having a TM office would have contributed to that.Red Bull decision envisions concurrent use in the field of dilution. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 9:58 am by Julie Deisher
Although the European Patent Office [official website] has upheld IPCom's patent [PC World report] on the technology in response to numerous challenges, Apple, along with several other entities... [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:12 am by Florian Mueller
The claim construction issue underlying all three of today's rejections involves a claim limitation that contains the word "bit", which both patent-specialized chambers of the court (in fact, this court has adjudicated far more wireless patent cases than any other court in the world) interpreted literally because otherwise the claim scope, which was narrowed by a recent post-grant decision by the European Patent Office, would not be distinguishable from… [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 1:45 am
More importantly, it is the European consumer who can ultimately vote those in power out of office. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:43 am
 This seminar was kindly hosted in the London office of law firm Bird & Bird and chaired by Sir Colin Birss. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 4:56 am by Florian Mueller
The European Commission has not closed the Samsung investigation yet even though Samsung also failed with its related attempts in multiple European countries. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:12 pm by Anjali Shankar
Patent and Trademark Office was recently approved with respect to certain computer games and clothing items. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 3:08 am
This Kat's flea-themed post last week concerning several developments at the European Patent Office elicited several useful comments about other developments at the EPO. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 2:44 am
In case of reasonable doubt as to the veracity of such declaration, the Office may require evidence. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:23 am
 Feel free to disagree however, preferably with legal basis.Finally, a kind commenter Antonio Pizzoli posted a link to this document, Draft Rules relating to Unitary Patent Protection, which is a draft of the rules relating to that portion of the Unitary patent system that is delegated to the European Patent Office. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 7:44 am
 From our good friend and recent guest Kat Bertrand Sautier comes the news that France passed a law yesterday to approve Europe's Unified Patent Court package, which was signed on February 2013. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 1:24 pm by Ben
Patent and Trade Office that artists, who write and make music, not copyright law, should determine who has rights to make remixes, sampling and mashups that include their songs. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 10:16 pm by Florian Mueller
Last June it became known that the European Commission is (on a preliminary basis) looking into a complaint over Google's Android business model. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 8:32 am
The date is Thursday, 13 March 2014, 6pm at the London office of Withers Worldwide LLP. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 11:28 am
Newsflash: The EPO plans to increase fleas from 1 April 2014; panic has beset the IPKat office. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 6:00 am by LTA-Editor
King is still awaiting word from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on a similar trademark application. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:13 pm by Daniel Mullen
Last month, the European Patent Office [official website] upheld IPCom's patent [PC World report] on the technology following challenges from Apple, Bokia, HTC, Ericsson and Vodafone. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 3:00 am by Florian Mueller
On Tuesday (February 11, 2014), Apple will have to defend itself in a German patent trial against a damages claim amounting to 1.57 billion euros ($2.12 billion), plus prejudgment interest, brought by German patent monetizer IPCom over a wireless standard-essential patent (SEP) upheld (in a narrowed but allegedly still standard-essential form) by the European Patent Office (EPO) last month. [read post]