Search for: "Evans v. State"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 2,627
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2007, 2:03 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Neil Martin Ltd v HM Revenue & Customs [2007] EWCA Civ 1041 (25 October 2007) Cadogan & Anor v Sportelli & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 1042 (25 October 2007) Boudh v Bodh [2007] EWCA Civ 1019 (25 October 2007) AA (Somalia) v SSHD [2007] EWCA Civ 1040 (25 October 2007) Kohn v Wagschal & Ors [2007] EWCA Civ 1022 (24 October 2007) Poole & Ors v HM Treasury [2007] EWCA Civ 1021… [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 7:05 pm
”The case cite is Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 1:10 am
See United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 6:32 am
A case from the First Department last week - Rhodes-Evans v 111 Chelsea LLC., 2007 NY Slip Op 07540 suggests that for many instances it does not. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 5:01 pm
Welcome to Blawg Review #130 -- the Northern Hemisphere edition! [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 7:36 am
(Decision, Launders v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 7:36 am
(Decision, Launders v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 5:06 am
Evans v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 6:41 am
State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 6:10 am
"In Billy James Smith v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Evans, 517 U.S. 620, 626, 629-31 (1996) (upholding Equal Protection challenge brought by municipalities and others against a state law prohibiting municipalities from adopting laws designed to protect homosexual persons from discrimination); Lawrence County v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 12:52 pm
We affirm.George Evan and Christine Evan v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 11:54 am
Earlier this week on Slaw Evan Van Dyk asked about podcasts and got a number of good suggestions. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 9:08 am
Evan over at InternetCases.com points to the case of Merle Norman Cosmetics v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 11:51 am
Although the Information Tribunal take pains to point out that their decision should not be seen as setting any precedents, in conjunction with previous decisions, Ministry of Defence v Information Commissioner and Rob Evans does help to clarify the situation somewhat (albeit that the typo in article 1 of the decision is particularly confusing (referring to "below" when the subsequent text makes it clear that it should be "above")).In general, 3 exemptions have… [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 7:19 am
Evans v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 5:39 am
Kendrick v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 5:56 am
Garcia v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 5:31 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 11:51 am
In Batson v. [read post]
