Search for: "Files v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 3,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
Symczyk (Granted )Docket: 11-1059Issue(s): Whether a case becomes moot, and thus beyond the judicial power of Article III, when the lone plaintiff receives an offer from the defendants to satisfy all of the plaintiff's claims.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (3d Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionMotion for leave to file and amicus brief of DRI - The Voice of the Defense BarMotion for leave to file and amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the… [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
Symczyk (Granted )Docket: 11-1059Issue(s): Whether a case becomes moot, and thus beyond the judicial power of Article III, when the lone plaintiff receives an offer from the defendants to satisfy all of the plaintiff's claims.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (3d Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionMotion for leave to file and amicus brief of DRI - The Voice of the Defense BarMotion for leave to file and amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:54 am
In the case of Healthcare Retirement Corporation of America v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:17 am
In Riegel v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:25 am
Yet none but a clairvoyant could have predicted the aftermath on June 15, 1982 when the Supreme Court in Plyler v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 12:27 pm
Frum may not have noticed that he is a tapping into a classic episode in United States Constitutional history. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:16 am
The National Labor Relations Board filed a Motion to Amend or Alter Judgment yesterday in Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v NLRB, Civil Action No. 11-2262, where District of Columbia District Court Judge James Boasberg struck down the NLRB's "quickie election" rules because the NLRB lacked a quorum when it passed the new rules. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:36 am
Amgen then filed a petition to the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:11 am
Plyler v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm
The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of AmericaDocket: 11-1139Issue(s): Whether the First Amendment, as interpreted by this Court in Jones v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:22 am
Comedy Partners United States Court of Appeals – 7th Circuit (6/7/12) An episode of the animated television show, South Park, entitled “Canada On Strike,” satirized the 2007-2008 Writers’ Guild of America strike, popular viral videos, and the difficulty of monetizing Internet fame. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:22 am
Royal Family Al-Saud United States Court of Appeals – DC Circuit (5/5/2012) Plaintiff filed a breach of contract action seeking over $12 million from the Royal Family Al-Saud and sixteen of its members (collectively, defendants) for failing to pay him for artwork he alleged they commissioned. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:08 am
Thanks to District Court Judge Joan Ericksen of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, next week NeoCon attendees will be able to see and experience both SEEYOND and BEYOND products, without likely confusion, when she confirmed last week in a written order her previous oral denial of the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order in Verscene Inc. and Seeyond Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:15 pm
Megaupload US argues it shouldn't have to give Megaupload user his legit files Kim Dotcom lampoons New Zealand MP in his new rap song Government trying to deny Megaupload fair legal representation Judge not impressed with government's arguments against preserving Megaupload data Carpathia blasts government for hypocrisy on Megaupload servers The Motion Picture Association of America filed a response on Tuesday to a motion to… [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:40 am
Attorney Preet Bharara brought the seizure and forfeiture action of United States Of America v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
(Court File No. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm
United StatesDocket: 11-959Issue(s): (1) Whether, when a false statement is made to an individual who has no connection whatsoever to the federal government, the false statement is nonetheless made in a “matter within the jurisdiction” of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:51 am
-Denver v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 9:05 am
Nor did the EEOC’s April ruling in Macy v Holder create a new protected class of transgender people, Feldblum said. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 10:05 am
” Pfaff v. [read post]
