Search for: "Harris v. Does"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 3,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2016, 3:21 am
The Harry’s Hot Dogs Case Sobel v Tulchiner, Short Form Order, Index No. 607651/16 [Sup Ct Nassau County Nov. 16, 2016], involves a Nathan’s Famous Hot Dogs franchise in the Bronx operated by a company called Harry’s Hot Dogs of Bay Plaza, LLC. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:15 am
State v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am
Fungoman LLC (Property, intangible) District Court M D Florida: Patentee entitled to permanent injunction despite granting earlier licenses where licensees and infringing party compete: Harris Corporation v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s oral argument on Tuesday in Perry v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:06 am
Parks, LLC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 1:49 pm
STEPHEN BARTH; from Harris County; 1st district (01? [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:08 am
In subsequent cases, the court has ruled that Section 2 does not require a state to maximize the number of districts in which a minority group can elect preferred candidates (Johnson v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 8:36 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
Research & resources Jonathan Baines, Information Rights and Wrongs: Courts, Contempt and Data Protection POLIS blog, Pharma online: does regulation or corporate social media policy need to change to allow a real dialogue about medicines? [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
Judgement was handed down by Dame Sharp, Simler LJ and Haddon-Cave LJ in Harry Miller -v- (1) The College of Policing (2) The Chief Constable of Humberside [2021] EWCA Civ 1926 on Monday 20 December 2021. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 6:05 am
Roe and Harris v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 6:05 am
Roe and Harris v. [read post]
Oracle to appeals court: Google concedes away the entire case under established copyright principles
5 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm
Nor does it mean that a broad concept, such as that of Write-Once-Run-Anywhere, would be owned exclusively by one company that describes it in a document. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 10:05 am
Read the May 2016 Order in State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:06 am
Not so in Oracle v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 1:46 pm
In other words, in such circumstances theapplicant would only be receiving what he or she was entitled to receive whenthe power was exhausted.The legislation does not prescribe what the FullCourt in Zschokke at 83,218 described as “preconditions” and nor would we seekto exhaustively prescribe matters that may be relevant to take into account inthe exercise of the discretion under s80(1)(h) of the Act. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am
For people who have been watching the recent North Carolina election cases like Harris v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 12:31 pm
Harris and Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:41 pm
By this point, Justice Elena Kagan, who went head-to-head with Alito in the 2014 decision in Harris v. [read post]
