Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2012, 12:48 pm
In Bartnicki v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:21 am
The Fourth Circuit held in the 1992 case of Lyle v. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 3:45 pm
In State v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 8:40 am
M.B. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 12:50 pm
” This was the first time a state had been held in breach of the Genocide Convention. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 4:55 am
In Rita v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 9:04 am
v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 2:26 pm
Blume asserted that Ashe v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 7:33 am
In a recent 5-4 decision (ZDI Gaming, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:21 am
In Pineda v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:23 am
The measure was similar to the blanket prohibition on persons subject to immigration control marrying without the Secretary of State’s written permission found to be unlawful in R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 9:12 am
If such provisions concern matters otherwise beyond Congress' legislative powers, the Constitution leaves their implementation to the States. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 2:28 pm
On January 24, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Thompson v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 10:20 am
In Price v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:44 pm
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 7:31 am
Woodall(which held that a state court decision merely declining to "extend" a SCTOUS precedent cannot be an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law under AEDPA). [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 8:08 am
United States v. [read post]
