Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 9,831
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2009, 11:08 pm
The court found In re Silica Products Liability Litigation, 398 F. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 5:13 am
In In re The W.W. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 7:46 pm
Re-design the legal profession. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 4:30 am
We’re not joking. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm
The plaintiffs allege that their competitors posted shill reviews to bodybuilding.com designed to harm the plaintiffs' business. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
" We all want that, though we're skeptical that it's really possible. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
This may sound like a far-fetched fantasy if you’re familiar with civil litigation in Canada. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 3:46 am
The Trilateral Meeting, organised by the AIPPI Italian, French and Spanish Groups, will consider IP issues in relation to sport, fashion, and design. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 9:12 am
Among other things, losing the dialogue between thoughtful UK judges and the CJEU will be one of the many other great losses for UK copyright. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:04 am
OSH Review Commission: We're split on the issue. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 1:30 pm
The continuance until April requested in AE 107A was therefore unwarranted, and proceedings would continue in a modified schedule designed to enable al-Hadi to participate as much as possible. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:30 am
Cross-examination by the Court: Not the hearty affirmation the judge was hoping for. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:16 pm
Compelling a company to re-engineer a product designed to provide robust encryption is the definition of unreasonably burdensome because it undermines the basic purpose of the product.[2] What’s more, forcing the installation of a generalized backdoor is not “in aid of the court’s jurisdiction,” since the court would be reaching beyond the specific targeted search to a generalized backdoor. [read post]
19 May 2016, 2:13 pm
They’re a serious threat. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 5:24 am
(Aereo will soon re-litigate this issue as the court moves to the full trial on the merits, but until then her earlier findings stand.) [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 10:08 am
Why do they think a Chinese court would enforce a contract designed to evade the law? [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 3:18 am
That Applicant may be the first and only user of a merely descriptive designation does not justify registration if the only significance conveyed by the term is merely descriptive. [read post]
3 May 2024, 2:59 pm
The key term "surveillance device" is defined as "an apparatus designed or adapted for use in surveillance" - i.e. a physical device rather than software. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 3:13 am
In re Naboso Technology, LLC, Serial No. 87236262 (February 27, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge David Mermelstein).Strength of the BAREFOOT marks: As to commercial strength, applicant pointed to eleven registrations for marks comprising the terms BAREFOOT, BARE FOOT, or BARE FEET for a variety of goods and services. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 9:36 am
” (19).Here, the district court tried to step into the shoes of the prior judge at that time of sentencing. [read post]
