Search for: "In Re: Mark M."
Results 2501 - 2520
of 7,664
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2016, 4:45 am
Right — so long as the trademark in question is THE trademark under which they’re doing business, that is. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
.), Montréal, 500-10-006031-155Décision de : Juges Nicole Duval Hesler (juge en chef), Mark Schrager et Robert M. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 2:11 pm
Or will we find ourselves worse off and wishing we could say, “You’re fired”? [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:22 pm
“I'm trying to find evidence of unlawful influence, he says, “the who is being influenced unlawfully, and the what. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 12:07 pm
I’d be interested to know if others think they were off the mark. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 7:17 pm
I’m writing this post from my winter home in Scottsdale, AZ where it’s currently a balmy 66 degrees. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 2:32 pm
In fact, if you’re suing your law school for bad grades, at least, your claim kind of disproves itself. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
And, again, that's all you're going to be allowed to hear until a jury is picked. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
A couple of observations: (1) No Notice of Suit Incoming (which is how they display regardless of whether they're about filing or resolution) showed up for the underlying litigation that led to the partial cancellation of the Louboutin mark. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 12:00 pm
I’m a supporter of the President. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 7:58 am
The former marks a very concrete possibility real changes going forward; the latter marks a potent symbolic passing of the manifestation of a foundational vision. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 5:54 am
If you run a website or other online service that fields such notices, you need to re-register to maintain safe harbor protections. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 10:03 pm
It’s also possible to go too narrow or too broad in the description of goods and services and risk being underwrote the, or possibly losing your mark later if you’re discovers to have overstated the scope of your use of the mark. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 10:03 pm
It’s also possible to go too narrow or too broad in the description of goods and services and risk being underwrote the, or possibly losing your mark later if you’re discovers to have overstated the scope of your use of the mark. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 10:03 pm
It’s also possible to go too narrow or too broad in the description of goods and services and risk being underwrote the, or possibly losing your mark later if you’re discovers to have overstated the scope of your use of the mark. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 7:09 pm
We’re not sure how Warhol managed the rights for his Mickey Mouse but apparently he didn’t run into the same kind of litigation in which 60’s cartoonist Dan O’Neill became embroiled. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:33 pm
Kugle and Mark M. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:33 pm
Kugle and Mark M. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:33 pm
Kugle and Mark M. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 1:01 am
Davidow, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, on Wednesday, November 23, 2016 Tags: Exchange Act, Investment banking, IPOs, Liability standards, Lock-up agreements, SEC, Section 13(d), Securities regulation, Shareholder suits, U.S. federal courts, Underwriting Negotiating Appraisal Conditions in Public M&A Transactions Posted by Victor Lewkow, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Wednesday, November 23, 2016 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Appraisal rights,… [read post]
