Search for: "In Re German"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 4,384
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2013, 4:47 am
Apple had sort of withdrawn two of its 12 asserted patents ("sort of" because it might re-raise them if an appeals court overturns an unfavorable claim construction). [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:38 am
We’re going to pursue those legal rights fully and completely, and we believe we’ll prevail. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
Years later, while a law student observing a Nazi war crime trial, he is re-united in a shocking way. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm
On the other hand, Médecins Sans Frontières noted that '[t]he Supreme Court's decision now makes patents on the medicines that we desperately need less likely. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:13 pm
On February 8, 2013 the Mannheim Regional Court stayed a German Apple v. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 1:34 am
It's now official that a new Apple v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
Here is what the Board had to say:*** Translation of the German original ***[3] Even the appellant admits that the possibility for an opponent to request re-establishment in view of an opposition fee that has been paid after the expiration of the time limit cannot be derived from A 122. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 8:42 am
, and has long called for Cyprus to re-examine the way its banks do business. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 10:36 am
They're saying, we’re not saying you should have a different structure, we're not saying anything about warning; we’re saying if you do this, [sell the product] you’re going to have to pay for the damage. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
The problem was discovered on June 1 only because the office staff was surprised to see that apparently no faxes had been received during the night.The ED considered that the requirement of all due care had not been complied with and refused re-establishment.The applicant then filed an appeal.Readers familiar with re-establishment case law will not be surprised that the appeal was not successful.*** Translation of the German original ***[3] As explained in great detail in… [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
In particular the decision of the BoA of February 3, 2011, is not a decision of the previous instance within the meaning of this provision [NB: contrary to the English version of A 24(1), the German version refers to a previous instance (Vorinstanz)]. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:25 pm
Reference was made to the German experience where in the past three years, only one vote against had been recorded.It was also argued that the primary virtue of shareholder ‘say on pay’ was making management feel that they were working for shareholders. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:32 am
Cf. also the history of the Latin words consecrāre and sacrificium.) [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 10:10 am
The next to last panel at the Yale Law School's March 2nd Location Tracking and Biometrics Conference was related to biometric identification and its implications for privacy in the hyper-connected world of the 21st century. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 3:51 pm
If you’re on the outside world of intelligence, you know nothing about it other than what the executive branch decides to tell you. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 10:02 pm
All establishments that were approved in 2012 must again re-submit a new 2013 Technical Proposal, (regardless if there are changes or not) before they are allowed to bid in 2013. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 12:50 am
Available abstracts are in French and German. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 11:14 am
(While we’re just rapping about C.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 10:28 am
German also likes abbreviations, and this word has one: ReÜAÜG. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
Therefore, it was this date that had to be taken into account when calculating the time limits under R 136(1).The Board disagreed:*** Translation of the German original ***[1] An applicant who, in spite of all due care required by the circumstances having been taken, was unable to observe the time limit for filing the statement of grounds of appeal may have his rights re-established upon request. [read post]
