Search for: "JAMES V. STATE"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 10,686
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2019, 8:42 am
In high-school history textbooks, Senator James G. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 2:00 am
In Kahler v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Notes that the Public Law Project will not be making oral submissions, but says these are important submissions. 1200: Michael Fordham QC says the closest case we have is Bobb & Anor v Manning (Trinidad & Tobago) [2006] UKPC 22 (25 April 2006). 11:55: Michael Fordham QC submits it is accepted prerogative power has to be exercised in the public interest. 11:48: Michael Fordham QC queries whether there is some magic for prerogative powers. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 12:21 pm
Espinoza v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:00 am
James W. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:03 am
’” A case on the Supreme Court’s docket this term, Espinoza v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 7:56 am
Ritchie and Kay Whitlock Race and the Death Penalty: The Legacy of “McCleskey v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 7:56 am
Representative James Blaine of Maine to amend the U.S. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 4:19 pm
Last August, we blogged about the most recent such case: Carpenter v United States.Carpenter was summarized in our post:Tim Carpenter was convicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan for a series of armed robberies in Detroit and across Northern Ohio. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
” McFarlin v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 7:29 am
It noted that the relevant footnote in James did nothing more than appropriately apply the aggrievement requirement to the facts of that case. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:30 am
E, Moritz v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:19 am
Folta v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:19 am
Folta v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 11:50 am
• Robert V. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 11:50 am
• Robert V. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:03 am
United States and Skilling v. [read post]
