Search for: "JOHNSON V. STATE"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 7,296
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2009, 10:21 am
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172 (1985), the decision that gave us the weird ripeness rules in regulatory takings. [read post]
16 Jan 2006, 6:55 am
State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 6:00 am
Baca (2002) 98 Cal.App.4th 1008, 1031, dis. opn. of Johnson, Acting P. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 10:49 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Willie Jones v. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 6:38 pm
This, coupled with Johnson's knowledge of defendant's recidivist history, previous parole violation and illegal drug use, possession and sales, was sufficient to provide the requisite individualized reasonable suspicion to support the search of defendant's home and the seizure of the drugs and related items found there (see Florida v J.L., 529 U.S. at 270-271; United States v Muhammad, 463 F3d at 121; People v Huntley, 43 NY2d at 181-182). [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 2:52 am
Crane, Cato Regulation magazine] “Solicitor General Inveighs Against Antitrust-Law Revolution in SCOTUS ‘Apple v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 4:24 pm
” David Spade v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
Supreme Court Justice William Johnson, Jr. who described the Constitution as a “tripartite contract among the people, the states, and the United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:10 am
State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 11:12 pm
And, as is apparent in a recent decision by EDNY Judge Garaufis in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 7:02 am
The case is styled, Johnson Medical Associates v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 7:15 am
The Nevada capital cases of Donte Johnson and Marlo Thomas remain pending. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 4:38 am
As stated by the Texas Supreme Court in 1994, in Light v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 11:42 pm
Today's SCOTUS decision in Beckles v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 7:23 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 3:55 am
They provide a lot of insight into the workings over at the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:13 pm
The Court’s reasoning Silber J considered the case of R (Animal Defenders International) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport [2008] UKHL 15 and concluded that even though that case is awaiting a ruling from the Grand Chamber in Strasbourg, he was bound by the House of Lords’ ruling that the prohibitions on political advertising contained in sections 319 and 321 of the 2003 Act were justified as being necessary in a democratic society and… [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 1:18 pm
U.S., U.S. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:23 am
The event will feature a panel discussion with Chief Justice Jefferson and Justices Hecht, Medina, Green, Johnson, Willett, and Lehrmann. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:23 am
The event will feature a panel discussion with Chief Justice Jefferson and Justices Hecht, Medina, Green, Johnson, Willett, and Lehrmann. [read post]
