Search for: "Jones v. District Court" Results 2501 - 2520 of 3,121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Zuccarini (The Gray Blog) (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (ipwars) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) District Court E D Michigan: Gripe site prevails in domain cybersquatting case: Career Agents Network, Inc v careeragentsnetwork.biz (Ars Technica)   US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Google - Google dismisses some claims and gets some attorneys’ fees: Jurin v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:24 am by Anna Christensen
The Hartford Courant has coverage of the Court’s denial of cert. on Monday in Sincerely Yours, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 12:31 am
This approach was on display during the dense and complex arguments in Samantar v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am by Adam Chandler
In a recap of the argument at the WSJ Law Blog, Ashby Jones notes that restrictions on gun ownership will remain largely subject to the political process regardless of the Court’s ruling in McDonald. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 6:45 am by Jay Willis
In her preview of Tuesday’s scheduled oral argument in McDonald v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:18 pm by Lyle Denniston
Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument in Samantar v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Int'l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc (Gray on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: ‘Consisting of’ and ‘consisting essentially of’ are not substantially identical: Kim v Earthgrains Co. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Int'l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc (Gray on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: ‘Consisting of’ and ‘consisting essentially of’ are not substantially identical: Kim v Earthgrains Co. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
Federal District Court for the Norther District of Iowa decided that the EEOC had failed to reasonably investigate before bringing charges against a trucking company. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:20 am by Cathy Reno
City of Chicago case, in which the Court will consider whether its 2008 landmark decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:30 am by Russ Bensing
  The 8th District’s decision last week in State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:30 am by Russ Bensing
  The 8th District’s decision last week in State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 6:37 pm
Buster, 984 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 2008), and each of the other District Courts of Appeal. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:05 am by Eugene Volokh
The second issue, in light of District of Columbia v Heller (__US__, 128 S Ct 2783 [2008]), unquestionably presents fair ground for litigation. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:49 am by Susan Brenner
Finally, on March 20, the anonymous source contacted Grim again and asserted that Fitzgerald and Mancini continued to sell `Kind Bud’ marijuana The next day, District Court Judge Ellinghaus-Jones issued a search warrant for Fitzgerald and Mancini's apartment based on Grim's affidavit. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
Jones Docket: 09-357 Issue: When a state court has reviewed the merits of a petitioner’s federal claim for plain error, is the decision of a federal court of appeals in a habeas corpus action that there was procedural default of that claim contrary to the decisions of this Court? [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 6:25 am by Howard Friedman
The court upheld prison restrictions denying plaintiff permission to grow his hair, prohibiting him from performing pipe ceremonies in his cell, and limiting vendors from whom he could buy a headband.In Jones v. [read post]