Search for: "Kennedy Thomas"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 4,886
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2013, 3:36 pm
” Justice Thomas authored the principal dissent, which Justice Kennedy joined in full and Justice Scalia joined in part. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm
(Justice Thomas, as is his normal practice, said nothing at argument.) [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:10 am
Demonstrating just how fractured the conservative bloc was in deciding this case, Justices Scalia and Thomas wrote dissents, with Justice Kennedy joining in the Thomas dissent. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:29 am
Justice Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the Court, and Justices Scalia, Thomas and Kennedy dissented. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Justice Alito, writing for himself, Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Scalia, Kennedy and Thomas, observed that, to have standing to sue in federal court under Article III of the Constitution, a plaintiff must suffer suffer a concrete and particularized injury that is “actual or imminent” and “fairly traceable” to the challenged action. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 8:31 am
Justices Scalia, Thomas and Kennedy dissented. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 8:11 am
ME (having Googled, reading from Wikipedia): "Kennedy. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 9:53 am
Justice Kennedy joined in the Thomas dissent, and Justice Scalia joined in it except for part I.B. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 9:20 am
Justice Thomas, Scalia and Kennedy dissented. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 6:17 pm
Justice Alito wrote the opinion of the court, and was joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 11:21 am
Ohio.Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan joined Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 11:21 am
Ohio.Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan joined Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:21 am
., and SCALIA, KENNEDY, and THOMAS, JJ., joined. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 2:14 pm
Thomas and Alito, two staunch conservatives, joined Justice Breyer in dissenting.To read the full opinion, click here. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 1:35 pm
Why, then, did 8 Justices (all but Justice Thomas) refuse to pull the trigger in NAMUDNO and invalidate Section 5? [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:31 am
And as with most of this run of civ pro cases (Iqbal and Wal-Mart being glaring exceptions), all three decisions were unanimous (Already included a short concurrence from Kennedy, Thomas, Alito, and Sotomayor, warning lower courts about the narrowness of the Court's decision). 2) Gunn does a very nice job of explaining the two situations in which a case arises under federal law. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 3:28 pm
Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined Justice Alito’s opinion. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 3:28 pm
Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined Justice Alito’s opinion. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 11:54 am
What we do know, however, is that 5 Justices, namely Justices Kennedy, Roberts, Thomas, Alito and Scalia all agreed that business methods are patentable subject matter. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
John Marshall, Oliver Wendell Holmes, and Benjamin Cardozo are among the Supreme Court justices who have grappled with how to interpret the jurisdictional phrase “arising under. [read post]
