Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B" Results 2501 - 2520 of 3,062
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm by NL
However, the Court of Appeal decided that a) the matter was of wider public interest and b) given that the appellant’s current AST was shortly to end, there was a [surely slim] possibility that Enfield would find that the chain of causation hadn’t been broken and that the appellant and his wife remained intentionally homeless, as per their review decision under appeal. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 7:45 pm by cdw
LEXIS 572 (Ind 10/5/2010) Relief denied on claims that the State failed to disclose exculpatory evidence, and, “trial counsel were ineffective because they: (a) failed to object to evidence regarding investigation of a life insurance claim, (b) failed to object to testimony regarding the presence of a non-testifying defense expert during DNA testing, (c) failed to object to the State’s 404(b) notice, (d) failed to object to the introduction of a receipt for the… [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:53 pm by Stephen Page
I appreciate therefore that refusing to follow such a Full Court authority is not a matter to be enterprised lightly or unadvisedly. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Although Davidoff says that so matter of factly that one might assume the claim is not contestable, in fact it's not at all clear that shareholders have "the ultimate choice of when to sell the company" and its perfectly clear (at least to me) that, as a matter of policy, they should not possess that right. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 12:49 pm by Stefanie Levine
Augustine (Partner at Foley & Lardner LLP and faculty member for the upcoming PLI Patent Litigation program) and Kevin J. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm by INFORRM
The information in the article fell into three categories: a. the fact that an allegation had been made by an unidentified person to the Met; b. the fact that the allegation was being investigated; and c. which gave credence to the allegation: which suggested that “there was something in it” – the inculpatory information. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
Furthermore, CIL is violated whenever a State, “as a matter of state policy,… practices, encourages or condones (a) genocide, (b) slavery… (c) the murder or causing the disappearance of individuals, (d) torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment… or (g) a consistent pattern of gross violations of internationally recognized human rights. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am by Pace Law Library
Why context matters: defining service animals under federal law. 37 Pepp. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm by Dorothy
MORGAN d/b/a SAINTS & SCHOLARS TATTOOS, Appellee. 2nd District.Insurance -- Automobile -- Appraisal -- Attorney's fees -- Where insurer demanded appraisal of stolen vehicle, and insured failed to comply with appraisal clause but filed suit prematurely, insured was not entitled to award of attorney's fees for that phase of trial court proceedings - [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 9:19 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
   whereas, notwithstanding this, it has been criticised following a number of rulings of the Court of Justice and is in need of modernisation, C. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 6:12 pm by W.F. "Casey" Ebsary, Jr.
The authority to make arrests under paragraph (5)(B) shall only be effective on and after the date on which the Attorney General publishes final regulations which (i) prescribe the categories of officers and employees of the Service who may use force (including deadly force) and the circumstances under which such force may be used, (ii) establish standards with respect to enforcement activities of the Service, (iii) require that any officer or employee of the Service is not authorized to… [read post]