Search for: "Mark C. Good" Results 2501 - 2520 of 5,964
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2016, 9:03 am by Bill Otis
Either tells us a good deal about the value of his thesis. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 7:36 am
This post examines an opinion from the California Court of Appeals – First District, Division 1. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 12:06 pm by Leanne Ta and Aaron Rubin
The district court held that Section 230(c)(1) preempted the plaintiff’s interference claim, but not her good faith and fair dealing claim. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 5:22 am by Afro Leo
Specifically, it relied on sections 34(1)(a) or 34(1)(c) of the Trade Marks Act, which provides for the infringement of a mark where there has been use of a same or similar mark, in respect of identical goods or services in the first instance or similar goods or services in the latter instance, provided there is likely to be deception or confusion in the marketplace.The SCA went into what the purpose of a trade mark is and how… [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 3:49 am by SHG
But that takes focus, effort, thought and time, and by then, the advocates are off to their next cause célèbre . [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 7:36 pm by Nikki Siesel
§1052(c) a name in a trademark would identify a living individual if the person bearing the name will be associated with the mark when used on the goods or services because the person is so well known that the purchasing public would reasonably assume a connection with the person and the goods or services. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 7:36 pm by Nikki Siesel
§1052(c) a name in a trademark would identify a living individual if the person bearing the name will be associated with the mark when used on the goods or services because the person is so well known that the purchasing public would reasonably assume a connection with the person and the goods or services. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 7:09 am by MBettman
 Ratonel later hired Mark Ropchock and his law firm, Roetzel & Andress, L.P.A. to sue KMK for legal malpractice for failure to make sure that Holden House was inspected prior to purchase. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:32 am by Jani Ihalainen
While arguments can be thrown back and forth, a recent case in the Court of Appeal set to decide the criminal ramifications of the sale of 'grey' goods in the UK, on which the Court handed down its judgment early last month.The case of R v C & Ors dealt with a limited liability company that sold shoes and clothing, the operation of which included several different defendants. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:56 pm
The Court found that the sale and distribution of grey goods can be a criminal offence under the article 92 of the Trade Marks Act 1994. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
A blogger, Jacqui Thompson, who lost a libel case with Carmarthenshire council’s chief executive, Mark James, could be forced to sell her house to pay the legal costs. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 8:15 am by Alex Young
This year marked the 20th anniversary of the annual ACMO/CCI-Toronto Condominium Conference. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 8:15 am by Alex Young
This year marked the 20th anniversary of the annual ACMO/CCI-Toronto Condominium Conference. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 8:15 am by Alex Young
This year marked the 20th anniversary of the annual ACMO/CCI-Toronto Condominium Conference. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:42 am
” -- see Eleonora Rosati’s view on the important case Soulier and Doke, C-301/15. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 3:19 am
A divided TTAB panel affirmed a Section 2(e)(4) refusal of the mark ADLON for various goods and services, including "hospitality industry services," finding it to be primarily merely a surname. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
The brand name 'TALA' displayed at the top of the cone; c. [read post]