Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 19,799
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2010, 7:49 pm
See Rambus v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 8:44 am
Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Many trademark attorneys and professors hoped the Supreme Court would provide more guidance on how to resolve conflicts between trademark and free speech rights in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 2:54 am
Sti. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 7:56 am
(Hague v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:00 pm
The fabrication of counterfeit money, whether coin or paper, counterfeit titles or coupons of public debt, created by national, state, provincial, territorial, local, or municipal governments, banknotes or other instruments of public credit; also counterfeit seals, stamps, dies, and marks of state or public administrations, and the utterance, circulation, or fraudulent use of the above mentioned objects. 14. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 2:47 pm
Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
That's the question presented in Hartney Fuel Oil Co. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:33 am
A Massachusetts trial judge, Mark Sullivan, in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 7:07 am
Trade MarksImage by Riana HarveyMarcel Pemsel demonstrated how difficult it can be to prove the distinctiveness of a figurative mark on its own, when it is generally used in conjunction with a word mark. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 7:48 am
Genometrica Research Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 9:01 pm
See United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:15 am
Or not....On December 10, the Beastie Boys filed an Answer and asserted counterclaims including copyright infringement, trade mark infringement, unfair competition, and misappropriation of right of publicity (under California state law). [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 2:57 pm
It states in pertinent part: Abandonment of a Mark. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 2:41 am
As required, it stated that it had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 1:24 pm
The Ninth Chamber of the General Court gave judgment today in a fierce battle over a Community trade mark application in Case T‑170/12, Beyond Retro Ltd v OHIM, the other party to the proceedings being a US company, S&K Garments, Inc., which was victorious in the Board of Appeal. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 3:40 am
Quaker State Oil Refining Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:36 am
As stated above, issue preclusion barred re-litigation of the first DuPont factor: the similarity of the marks. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:22 pm
The defendant is an Amazon merchant allegedly selling items bearing the mark. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:56 pm
United States, 530 U. [read post]
