Search for: "Matter of M C B"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 3,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2011, 9:31 pm
CARNEY: Well, let me address that question and I’ll—forgive me, I’m going to read so I’m very precise here. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 12:10 pm
One cannot read the actions anticipated to be formally announced tomorrow without also considering how they coordinated with a series of rapid fire recent decisions including actions to (a) reduce aid to Honduras, El Salvador, and Guatemala; (b) recognize the Guaidó administration in Venezuela and take active measures to hobble the Madura regime; (c) sanctions against Nicaraguan officials; and (d) close the Mexican border. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:06 am
§78fff(b). [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
As a matter of first impression for our Circuit, we hold that the legislative invocation at issue constitutes government speech. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
Plant-based milks thus invalidate animal-based milk in a way that Wegmans paper towels do not invalidate Bounty paper towels.I must allow, of course, for the possibility that the decision to try to block plant-based milks from using the “m word” is simply a profit-driven decision. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:46 pm
BMJ and Deer should have no trouble whatsoever meeting that definition — the complaint targets speech about a classic matter of public concern. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:47 pm
Still, here’s my rough sense of the matter: a. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 10:42 pm
I would have to say I’m with LJ Rix on this one. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 5:57 am
B. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 1:27 pm
B. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am
” I’m going to go Scalia one better and insert some reaction gifs here. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 10:01 am
It reviewed documents previously generated by CYBERCOM and by the Joint Staff to educate their own leadership on the pros and cons. b. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
MOORE, Assistant Counsel, Buffalo Public School District (Allison B. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
Plaintiffs sued under the anti-doxing statute, which allows people to sue "for improper disclosure of private information" based on a showing that: [a] The defendant, with the intent to stalk, harass or injure the plaintiff, knowingly caused personal information to be disclosed; [b] The defendant knew or reasonably should have known that the plaintiff did not consent to the disclosure; [c] The plaintiff is stalked [as defined in Oregon criminal and civil stalking… [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:49 am
I’m not satisfied that he has abandoned all ideas of taking Raja out of the country…. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am
“Private interest” is defined by exclusion; it “does not include an interest in a decision or matter (a) that is of general application; (b) that affects a public office holder as one of a broad class of persons; or (c)that concerns the remuneration or benefits received by virtue of being a public office holder. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:35 am
Moreover, as to the injuries that these plaintiffs did have, "the PDR specifically warned of the[m]" so the warnings that mattered were adequate as a matter of law. [read post]
3 Sep 2022, 8:51 am
§ 2261A(2)(B)…. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 12:52 am
M. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:50 pm
Alternatively, if C is an undercover informant and agrees to speak on the phone to D and have the call taped by the government, D has consented under a third-party consent theory. [read post]
