Search for: "Miller, v. United States"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 2,645
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2008, 5:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 12:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
This morning at 9:30, the Court of Appeal for the Sixth Appellate District will hear oral argument in County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Lopez-DeLeon, No. 06-41553 A sentence for illegal reentry is affirmed where defendant's prior California conviction for sexual intercourse with a minor qualified as a "crime of violence" within section 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, as documents established that the victim in that matter was under the age of 14. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because statutes enacted under the Spending Clause of the United States Constitution must provide clear notice to the States of their liabilities should they decide to accept federal funding under those statutes, and because we conclude that NCLB fails to provide clear notice as to who bears the additional costs of compliance, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 08a0007p.06 Blackburn… [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 10:17 am
Miller. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 9:21 am
" Opinion, p. 19 (quoting, United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 5:06 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 1:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 7:56 am
Randy E, Barnett (Georgetown) is first and begins by discussing Gonzales v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 7:56 am
United States, 858 F .2d 416 (8th Cir.1988) (same); Miller v. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 4:08 am
United States, 208 U.S. 161 (1908)(striking down ban on "yellow-dog" contracts that forbade workers from joining trade unions.)Muller v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 11:26 am
Yesterday CAAF docketed two certified issues in an Air Force case:WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS APPLIED THE CORRECT STANDARD OF REVIEW WHEN DETERMINING WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE DENIED THE DEFENSE MOTION FOR A SANITY BOARD.WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED BY FINDING THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE DENIED APPELLANT'S REQUEST FOR A SANITY BOARD FINDING HE HAD NOT MET HIS BURDEN OF FACTUAL PERSUASION TO JUSTIFY… [read post]
24 Dec 2007, 7:01 am
This list was put together by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Title V/CSHCN has supported care notebooks for families and hired parent advocates around the state. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 1:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 3:14 pm
This list was put together by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 10:22 am
Constitution for the first time since the 18 paragraph decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
Snyder's case was back before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:08 am
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate assistance. [read post]
