Search for: "NEW JERSEY v. UNITED STATES"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 3,521
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2011, 1:37 pm
The company is a New Jersey corporation with its principal place of business in Hamilton, New Jersey. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 10:42 pm
No. 99–345, at 9 (1986), reprinted in 1986 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5266, 5274; see also United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 385 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2004)), with jurisdiction over Michigan – yet another court out of New York now presumes to know New Jersey law better than the New Jersey courts (McDarby v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 11:06 am
In a refreshing change for this conservative United States Supreme Court, the justices gave broad application to Title VII’s anti-retaliation protections in its recent decision in Thompson v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:30 pm
In United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:54 am
Nicastro, a New Jersey plaintiff sued a British machine manufacturer in New Jersey state court alleging that the machine was defective and had seriously injured him. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:03 am
Here is Angelo’s guest post:: On June 10, 2011, Judge Barbara Jones of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a decision in a case entitled SEC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:03 am
Here is Angelo’s guest post:: On June 10, 2011, Judge Barbara Jones of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a decision in a case entitled SEC v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 10:15 am
As I explained in an earlier post, the New Jersey Supreme Court held that under the New Jersey Constitution, citizens (and residents) of New Jersey do have a constitutional expectation of privacy in IP addresses. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:53 am
The last point is the takeaway from the recent case of United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 1:07 pm
McIntyre had targeted the United States as a whole, New Jersey’s courts lacked jurisdiction because the company had not “purposefully availed itself of the New Jersey market. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 6:02 am
New Jersey was not immune to this and in 2003, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided the case of Moriarty v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 10:09 pm
Joe Oglesby, a former United States Marine, filed a complaint with the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:27 pm
This case arose from a products-liability suit filed in New Jersey state court. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:26 am
McIntyre Machinery in New Jersey. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:25 am
Nicastro filed a products liability suit in a state court in New Jersey, where the accident occurred. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:48 pm
McIntyre had very few contacts with New Jersey; although a distributor sold the machines in the United States, only four of them (at most) were located in New Jersey. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:05 pm
Six justices viewed this as sufficient to establish minimum contacts with the United States, but not with New Jersey, with the latter being necessary for jurisdiction in state court or in the absence of a federal statute (more on that below). [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:46 am
” And finally, in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:37 am
The Court undertook an analysis that accounted for a number of case specific factors, taking guidance from the United States Supreme Court's holding in Met Life v. [read post]
