Search for: "Peoples v. Peoples" Results 2501 - 2520 of 72,904
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2023, 4:35 am by jonathanturley
Then to make the week complete, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm by Gareth Davies
A rule on signs of religion is purely about how people perceive and are perceived. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:00 am by Barbara Pfeffer Billauer
By Barbara Pfeffer Billauer Approaches to resolving scientific evidentiary issues continue to diverge throughout the country.[1] A prominent recent example includes the rejection of the medical diagnosis of Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS) to reflect disparate views in the scientific, medical, and legal communities. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 4:54 am by Beatrice Yahia
Footage showed people covered in powder from the extinguisher as security guards rushed people out of the vicinity. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 3:43 am by Allison Williams
  Many believe that it is progressive because it provides for access to copyrighted works for people with disabilities. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:32 pm by Sambhav Sankar
The court had already held in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:15 am by centerforartlaw
However, there are a number of downsides to litigation that pose real problems for the art world: (1) court proceedings are public forums that offer little confidentiality for litigants seeking to protect their reputation; (2) art-related disputes are often internationalized – requiring parties to bring claims in foreign, unfamiliar jurisdictions; (3) court remedies may fail to satisfy non-conventional stakeholders — such as Indigenous peoples — who may seek the return of… [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 11:00 am by Unknown
(openDemocracy, Oct. 2023) [text]Colombia: IACHR Commends New Nationality Law (OAS, Nov. 2023) [text]Home at last: How Niger is working towards the eradication of the risk of statelessness (UNHCR, Nov. 2023) [text]‘I have no rights’: what happens to stateless people in Australia after the High Court’s ruling? [read post]