Search for: "Persons v. Jones" Results 2501 - 2520 of 3,905
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2019, 12:48 pm
In the latter case, consent to the use of one's own likeness must be obtained, in the first place, from the person's spouse and children.An estate that has been quite keen on enforcing post mortem image rights is that of actress Audrey Hepburn. [read post]
15 May 2017, 12:12 pm by Matthew Kahn
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument today in Hawaii v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 10:31 pm by Jeff Gamso
Something like 75 of us signed the brief on Brian's behalf.And now in Texas.The case filed in the Texas Supreme Court, is In re David Dow v. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 6:57 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Eliot Kim summarized the Supreme Court’s ruling in Jam v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 10:15 pm by GWS Law
It is for that reason that a prof neg claim arising out of a PI claim does not qualify as a claim for personal injury for the purpose of QOCS, or indeed for any other purpose such as limitation; Jones v GR Smith & Co (8 February 1993, unreported, CA). (7) By r44.13(1)(c) QOCS does not apply to applications for pre-action disclosure. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 5:00 am by Guest Blogger
[1] Smith v Jones [1999] 1 SCR 455, 169 DLR (4th) 385 at para 35 [read post]