Search for: "Price v. Price"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 18,042
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
The first decision, Villanueva v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 4:16 pm
ConstitutionCalifornia v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 2:40 am
Contents include: Naomi Egel & Steven Ward, Hierarchy, revisionism, and subordinate actors: The TPNW and the subversion of the nuclear order Marius Wishman & Charles Butcher, Beyond ethnicity: historical states and modern conflict Hoo Tiang Boon, International identity construction: China’s pursuit of the responsible power identity and the American Other Tobias Berger, Worldmaking from the margins: interactions between domestic and international ordering in mid-20th-century India… [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:31 pm
In brief, the main issue before the court in Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
Holdings, Ltd. v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 5:24 am
On May 21, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery denied Petitioners’ motion for reargument in the Aruba Networks appraisal litigation, styled as Verition Partners Master Fund Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:51 am
We’ll continue to monitor the TXU v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 1:46 pm
V. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 1:17 pm
Circuit decisions Cellco Partnership v. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 12:17 pm
I just wrote about it in the previous post (the first one of a series of three posts on FTC v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:11 am
Western and Foxpace renegotiated the contract for sale at a price of £6 million. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:16 am
State v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 3:46 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 5:19 pm
US v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 2:10 pm
McHale v Cadogan [2010] EWCA Civ 1471 is turning into a bit of a Jarndyce v Jarndyce. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 2:10 pm
McHale v Cadogan [2010] EWCA Civ 1471 is turning into a bit of a Jarndyce v Jarndyce. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 1:53 pm
Similarly, if the Change Directive is reducing the amount of the Contractor’s work, it should include the amount of the associated price decrease or schedule acceleration. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 7:03 am
Jermyn v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 1:46 am
The court noted that Art.5(2) might also apply in price comparison cases. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 8:02 am
Any implication that a provision in the Agreement that Weaver might receive 25% of the sale price of the company indicated an ownership interest was negated by the right of first refusal provision in the Agreement, which would require Weaver to pay the same price as a third-party bidder, indicating no such ownership interest.The judge concluded that, except for any compensation due to Weaver under the Agreement, for which calculation sufficient information has already been… [read post]
