Search for: "Reading v. Attorney General" Results 2501 - 2520 of 12,773
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2013, 10:21 am
By Daniel Bane  Alliance for the Protection of the Auburn Community Environment, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm by Sherica Celine
Read now » Related Content State Sales Tax Thresholds Post-Wayfair Still Far From Settled See how the Wayfair court renounced the long-standing precedent in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
Additionally, the Attorney General asserted in the same guidance that the state’s pre-Roe abortion ban, the one that was specifically struck down by The Supreme Court in its 1973 Roe v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:41 pm by Greg May
Jan. 6, 2010) did yesterday, you know the opinion is going to be an interesting read — if you’re an appellate attorney, anyway. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 1:15 am by Dennis Crouch
As the Solicitor General correctly notes (Br. 10-15), Samsung’s effort to read an apportionment requirement into § 289 is at odds not only with the statute’s plain language, but also with Congress’s contemporaneous explanation that the remedy was enacted in response to decisions of this Court taking exactly the approach Samsung now advocates. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 12:30 pm by Mark Walsh
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In general, damages may not be speculative, possible, or imaginary, but must be capable of being proven with reasonable certainty and directly traceable to the conduct or negligence of the defendant (see generally Kenford Co. v Erie Cty., 67 NY2d 257, 261 [1986]). [read post]
Supreme Court on October 3, 2018), as well as whether claims under California’s Private Attorneys General Act must now be arbitrated. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:48 pm by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
The main lesson for plaintiff’s attorneys from the decision in Harvey v. [read post]
District Court Judge James Boasberg’s dismissal of various States Attorneys General’s antitrust case brought against Facebook (now, Meta Platforms). [read post]