Search for: "See v. See"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 122,080
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2024, 10:31 am
See also the work of FAMIMOVE. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:26 am
That would be certainly a possibility as not only the Berne Convention (Article 2(3)) mandates the protection of inter alia “other alterations of … artistic work”, but derivative works have been also held protectable under UK law (think of the famous Hyperion Records v Sawkins [IPKat here] as an example). [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 7:59 am
Kreglinger had also designed new packaging (see image right), which Justice Beach found to be "a world away from the packaging of the VCC wines. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm
After all, Missouri v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 5:39 pm
Hartigan v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm
Barrett v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm
559, 559-60 (1997); see also Logan E. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 7:50 am
Services v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 7:30 am
Annor v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 1:57 am
Or is this more of a Brigham City v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 5:29 pm
In Chesanovska v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 5:15 pm
https://www.courthousenews.com/judicial-body-acts-to-curb-judge-shopping/; see also https://www.bloomberglaw.com/bloomberglawnews/us-law-week/X2O6UQMC000000? [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 1:45 pm
See United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:35 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 11:28 am
Again, as a practical matter I'm sure this will work out straightforwardly on remand, but I wonder whether we will see more "To the extent that X, we vacate/reverse" decretal language in the future.The post Ambiguous Vacatur in Lindke v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 9:40 am
While the jury is still out as to whether downtown Cleveland’s office employers no longer see as much value in the cultural and collaborative benefits of having their workforces interact together on a non-virtual basis, case studies of office building upgrades from office markets throughout the country are proving out that landlords are seeing rent and occupancy benefits from investments made to update office spaces to contemporary needs. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
As such, defendants submitted undisputed documentary evidence that conclusively establishes a defense as a matter of law (see Matter of Lewis v Dagostino, 199 AD3d at 1222-1223; Jenkins v Jenkins, 145 AD3d 1231, 1235-1236 [3d Dept 2016]). [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
B. v Monroe-Woodbury Cent. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
See Incorporating Under A Disparaging Name. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 8:57 pm
And that list could be checked against appellate record, to see if those judgments were sustained or reversed. [read post]
