Search for: "Self v State" Results 2501 - 2520 of 14,075
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am by Derek T. Muller
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee (24… [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am by Derek T. Muller
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee (24… [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 5:14 am by INFORRM
  Punitive damages can, for example, be awarded in defamation cases in the United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 10:31 am
Rightly so.I'm less confident that Justice Wiley is correct when he says "This mental state—requiring only proof that Canales voluntarily inserted his finger or penis into his stepdaughter’s vagina, without any further level of mental culpability—satisfies the presumption of mandatory culpability. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Weinrib, University of Chicago Law School, for her essay, “The Sex Side of Civil Liberties: United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 6:25 am by Jon Sands
The precedent, notably US v Bettancourt, 614 F.2d 214 (9th Cir. 1980), states that prior assaults are rarely permissible under 404(b). [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm by MOTP
The affidavit was signed by a self-described employee of Transworld Systems, Inc., whom the Panel elevated to the status of a custodian of records for the occasion. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:56 pm by Gene Killian
” But: The policy contained an endorsement stating that the policy “is hereby amended by the deletion of the [Regulatory] Exclusion. [read post]