Search for: "Shields v. State" Results 2501 - 2520 of 4,626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of David v Gabriel [2016] EWHC 2799 (QB)) -although, somewhat curiously, the judgment states it was handed down on 1 November 2016. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 3:00 pm
While there is a minimum level of protection below which no state can go, the fact that some states provide greater protections does not require New York to do the same. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:05 am by Antitrust Today
United States Potato Growers of Idaho Inc., et al., No. 10-CV-307-BLW) and the Northern District of California (Marvilla v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:25 am
“This is another example of close cooperation between the department’s Antitrust Division and state antitrust officials resulting in an outcome that protects competition and benefits consumers,” Acting Assistant Attorney General Pozen added.The text of the proposed final judgment in United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 6:55 am by Stewart Baker, Bryce Klehm
In the words of the Justice Department’s Criminal Resource Manual, in order to find someone guilty of violating the RICO statute under the “more expansive view” of U.S. v. [read post]