Search for: "Small v. United States" Results 2501 - 2520 of 7,077
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm by Adam Wagner
The Trust argued that the reasoning in Osman v United Kingdom (23452/94) (1999) 1 FLR 193 ECHR was not applicable to the care of hospital patients. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 10:55 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Around the same time, however, the United States Supreme Court decided Melendez-Diaz -v- Massachusetts. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 8:21 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 Around the same time, however, the United States Supreme Court decided Melendez-Diaz -v- Massachusetts. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:22 pm by cdw
United States remands for an evidentiary hearing on claims relating to the failure to investigate and present mitigation evidence. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:37 am
In relevant part, § 1442(a)(1) provides that `[a] civil action . . . that is commenced in a State court’ may be removed to federal court if the action is against `any officer (or any person acting under that officer) of the United States . . . for or relating to any act under color of such office. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Or, to the extent they are functioning well, as in Norway, say, that may be a function of its small population and its relative homogeneity. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am by Jack Sharman
  As in the United States, the communication, to be protected, must  concern the offering or receiving of legal advice (as opposed to business advice or strategic counsel). [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:59 am by James Bickford
  Today, the Court hears argument in McComish v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 10:35 am by John Floyd
Following the lead of the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:47 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority); application of CEQA to council enactment of measures which qualify as initiatives on local ballots (Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 4:44 am by Susan Brenner
As Wikipedia notes, ineffective assistance is a claim raised by a convicted criminal defendant that their attorney’s performance was so ineffective that it deprived them of the constitutional right guaranteed by the Assistance of Counsel Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:32 pm by Ken
The Human Rights Commission also announces — rather triumphantly, I think — that it does not matter that Encyclopedia Dramatica is hosted and written in the United States, because Australian law, as reflected in Dow Jones v. [read post]