Search for: "State Bar Association v. State" Results 2501 - 2520 of 9,045
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2007, 2:32 pm
"More detail of Perfumebay.com, Inc. v. eBay Inc. after the jump. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm by Lyle Denniston
Settlement of a dispute over waiver of arbitration rights has led the Supreme Court to dismiss a case that it was scheduled to decide in its next Term starting in October — Stok & Associates v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 6:03 am by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for state and local officials in Arizona v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:03 am by Layla Kuhl
The Michigan Supreme Court invited the Environmental Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan to file a brief amicus curiae. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 11:30 am by Mark Graber
Hubley Ashton and Maxwell Evarts, who argued United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 7:25 am by Bradley Wrightsel
The Ohio Supreme Court in its decision, Columbus Bar Assn. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:45 am by Victoria Kwan
Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor are set to appear together as part of the New York City Bar Association’s Barbara Paul Robinson Series on October 25. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Under the approach most closely associated with the 1965 case of Linkletter v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 5:30 pm by Mary Whisner
Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association, or—of course— Indian Law (Lone Wolf v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:04 am by Amy Howe
At Verdict, Vikram Amar analyzes the legislature’s brief in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust, which asks whether Constitution’s due process clause bars a state from taxing trusts when beneficiaries of trust are state residents, the “trust does not have the minimum contacts with North Carolina which are constitutionally necessary for North Carolina to tax the trust’s income. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:15 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit barred the state from enforcing most of the law. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 1:27 pm by Monroe Freedman
Scullin (NYLJ, July 24, 2007)  The appellate panel disagreed with Judge Scullin in finding that one provision of the rules, which bars ads from portraying a "fictitious law firm" or "the use of a fictitious name to refer to lawyers not associated together in a law firm" was "actually misleading" and not entitled to First Amendment protection. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
The justices also sent United States v. [read post]