Search for: "State v. David." Results 2501 - 2520 of 14,227
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2023, 6:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Miho Suzuki v Greenberg 2023 NY Slip Op 31289(U) April 21, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 159360/2021 Judge: David B. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:47 am by Trevor Covey
In Berry v Schmitt, the Sixth Circuit held that the Kentucky Bar Association (“KBA”) could not use Kentucky Rule of Professional Conduct 8.2(a) to bar an attorney, John Berry, from commenting on the Kentucky Legislative Ethics Commission investigation of Senate President David Williams. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Supreme Court resolved this landmark case in 1964, New York Times v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 5:12 am
Located On: Ford & Harrison LLP Most Popular State Law Article California Management Update (pdf). [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:09 am by Amy Howe
Hasen discusses changes to some states’ voting laws in the wake of last Term’s decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 5:29 am by Amy Howe
Also at The Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr outlines “some of the possible Fourth Amendment rules that the Court might consider” in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:37 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
Judge David Hamilton's concurring opinion in that case illustrates the importance of choice-of-law clauses and how predictability over which state's law applies is essential to litigation strategy. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 11:17 am by Dennis Crouch
Matal is expressed in Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty, Ltd. v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:15 pm by Josh Richman
”  For the amended complaint: https://www.eff.org/document/alhathloul-v-darkmatter-group-first-amended-complaint For Exhibit A to the amended complaint: https://www.eff.org/document/alhathloul-v-darkmatter-group-first-amended-complaint-exhibit For Exhibit B to the amended complaint: https://www.eff.org/document/alhathloul-v-darkmatter-group-first-amended-complaint-exhibit-b For more on this case:… [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
But query whether in the federalism context, where other plain-statement rules such as that announced in 1991 in Gregory v Ashcroft (which requires Congress to clearly say in the text of a regulatory statute that the statute applies to state and local government entities before states can be required to obey) seem designed to make sure Congress has carefully considered state interests, Congress itself has to be the one to fix any vagueness problems in the terms of… [read post]