Search for: "State v. Seven"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 11,122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
Hasday* When the State of California and Planned Parenthood recently sued the Trump Administration over regulations implementing an abortion gag rule,[1] they must have thought they had a good chance before the famously liberal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 4:03 pm
Katz in a widely read blog entitled Access Copyright v. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 9:30 am
Yet the Chief Justice's unquestioning adoption of ECUSA's unsupported number somehow became the law of the case: twenty-nine parishes had supposedly "acceded" in writing to the Canon, while another seven had not: therefore, the latter seven could hold on to their property, while the others could not.Along his destructive way, Chief Justice Beatty tossed out another firebomb with his aside that "[i]n my view, the disassociated diocese [of Bishop Lawrence]… [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:04 pm
Yet the Chief Justice's unquestioning adoption of ECUSA's unsupported number somehow became the law of the case: twenty-nine parishes had supposedly "acceded" in writing to the Canon, while another seven had not: therefore, the latter seven could hold on to their property, while the others could not.Along his destructive way, Chief Justice Beatty tossed out another firebomb with his aside that "[i]n my view, the disassociated diocese [of Bishop Lawrence]… [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:30 am
In the first nine months of 2019 alone, seven states banned all or most abortions. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 6:38 am
At issue in this case is whether the Supreme Court of Ohio should update and clarify its attorney fee jurisprudence by adopting the United States Supreme Court’s guidance in Perdue v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm
This directive also permitted the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division to redelegate the authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands to other DOJ Officials, including United States Attorneys.[5] From a practical standpoint, the redelegation of authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands from the Office of the Attorney General to the 94 United States Attorneys Offices has greatly expanded the issuance of Civil Investigative Demands around the country. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:37 am
According to letters written by Schiff to Maguire, it appears Maguire did not transmit the disclosure to the committee—as he was required to do under the statute—within seven days. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 3:05 am
It is worth making explicit the parallels between the Supreme Court’s acknowledgment of the first in New York Times v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:04 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Texas, MRC Energy Company v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 6:32 am
New York State Labor Law has long required manual workers to be paid on a weekly basis and no later than seven calendar days after the end of the week in which the wages are earned. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:19 pm
EFF’s annual Pioneer Awards ceremony celebrates individuals and groups who have made outstanding contributions to freedom and innovation on the electronic frontier. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:26 am
Schiedmayer Celesta GmbH v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:38 am
Yesterday the New York State Department of Financial Services issued Circular Letter No. 11 (2019) RE: New York State Child Victims Act and Related Insurance. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:13 am
In Colon v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 8:14 am
If that argument swayed the Supreme Court, the court’s ultimate decision on the merits may owe much to its 2018 decision in Trump v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:18 am
Heller in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 8:41 pm
Sebelius (distinguishing the assessment or collection of a tax from an underlying policy rule), and Seven-Sky v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 8:41 pm
Sebelius (distinguishing the assessment or collection of a tax from an underlying policy rule), and Seven-Sky v. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 4:33 pm
, 2015 WL 1959935- evidence sufficient to hold shareholder personally liable for a $6 million dollar penalty; State v. [read post]
