Search for: "State v. Vanness"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 3,482
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2011, 12:27 pm
Amir Sitafalwalla v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:40 am
The absence of an arguable right under domestic law may not of itself have been determinative of the matter – the concept of a “civil right” is an autonomous one (Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v Belgium (1981) 4 EHRR 1). [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:15 am
Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Sony Supply Chain Solutions (Europe) BV, formerly Sony Logistics Europe BV (Case C-153/10); [2011] WLR (D) 130 “A person who made customs declarations in his own name and on his own behalf could not rely on a binding tariff information of which he was not the holder, but which associated company on whose instructions he made those declarations. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
: cultural, legal and philosophical challenges / Anine Kierulf & Helge Rønning (eds.).Göteborg, Sweden: Nordicom, [2009] Gaming LawKF8210.G35 U53 2010Understanding gaming law issues : leading lawyers on understanding recent changes in state and tribal gambling, handling economic and regulatory pressures, and anticipating future legal trends. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm
Granted, it's only recognized in Louisiana, but there's no case out there stating flat out that Pennsylvania (or probably most other states) refuse to recognize it. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:11 pm
The Virginia Court of Appeals en banc reaffirms the panel decision in Foltz v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:22 pm
In the case of State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 7:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:37 pm
" Earthjustice President Trip Van Noppen said, "We need a partnership between government and business to harness our most extraordinary natural resource? [read post]
Analysis: Schoolboy scandals and defamation in South Africa. Quo vadis? – Dario Milo and Greg Palmer
28 Mar 2011, 6:33 am
In the “interview”, Falwell states that his “first time” was during a drunken incestuous rendezvous with his mother in an outhouse. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:30 am
They pitted small v. small employers, large v. large, municipal, gov’t., etc. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 7:45 am
In Arlington v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am
Courcelles (2002), 60 O.R. (3d) 20 (C.A.) in the context of an Internet-based libel action, which the Ontario Court of Appeal recently modified and reformulated in Van Breda v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:06 am
Van Gogh’s in painting The Irises? [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 8:54 am
The Court recalled that the founding treaties of the EU, unlike ordinary international treaties, established a new legal order, possessing its own institutions, for the benefit of which the States have limited their sovereign rights, in ever wider fields, and the subjects of which comprise not only member States but also their nationals (see, inter alia, Case 26/62 van Gend & Loos [1963] ECR 1, 12 and Case 6/64 Costa v ENEL [1964] ECR 585, 593). [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 3:08 am
State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:22 pm
’” United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:59 am
The case is Williamson v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
")Camper Van Beethoven - "Good Guys and Bad Guys" ("Well there are good guys and there are bad guys / And there are crooks and criminals / There are doctors and there are lawyers / And there are folks like you and me. [read post]
