Search for: "Tom v. State" Results 2501 - 2520 of 3,146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2015, 2:16 am by INFORRM
Defamation on Facebook: Isparta v Richter 2013 6 SA 529 (GP) Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, Vol. 17, No. 6, 2014, Anneliese Roos and Magda Slabbert, SSRN The Resistance of Memory: Could the European Union’s Right to be Forgotten Exist in the United States? [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:01 am by Jeff Kosseff
" A barrier to the NAACP's argument for anonymous speech rights was Lewis Publishing Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:15 am by Eleonora Rosati
As a result, Poland’s action should fail and Article 17 be upheld.The judgment’s implicationsToday’s ruling will have a vast impact, both with regard to the application of already existing national transpositions of the DSM Directive and the transposition thereof by the remaining Member States (MS). [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Staines reports that Tom Watson MP also published the full text of the Campbell submission on his blog, but the post has now been removed. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:10 am by Ilya Somin
  For example, a clear statement is needed before a statute is read to interfere with a state's internal governance (Gregory v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:37 am by James Bickford
  The unanimous decision in Maqaleh v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:18 am by Justin Silverman
Consider porn star Stormy Daniels and her potential Louisiana State Senate run. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 1:25 pm by justinsilverman
Consider porn star Stormy Daniels and herpotential Louisiana State Senate run. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:54 am by Graeme Hall
In the courts: BN, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2367 (Admin) (16 September 2011): Sec of State irrational in ignoring fresh evidence in Malawi asylum claim. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 7:00 am by Tara Hofbauer
He shared Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins’ statement in the 9/11 case United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am by Andrew Hamm
United States) “The Boldest Moves: When and How to Make Them” (focusing on the power grab in Bush v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
Despite the presence of avowed Trump-skeptics in the narrow GOP Senate majority, several marginally qualified or ethically challenged nominees (such as Betsy DeVos, Mick Mulvaney, Jeff Sessions, Tom Price, and Rex Tillerson) were confirmed on narrow, close-to-party-line votes. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]