Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges" Results 2501 - 2520 of 16,262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2011, 11:21 am
  According to the Ninth Circuit, the defendant here is guilty of being "found" in the United States upon his return. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 3:19 am by Florian Mueller
On February 13, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hold the appellate hearing in FTC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:56 am by Jon
The Fourth Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 12:09 pm by Florian Mueller
The former Chief Judge of the United States Corut of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Randall R. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:09 am by Linda McClain
On Friday, October 26, the Solicitor General, on behalf of the United States, filed a supplemental brief urging the Court that the case of Windsor v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:40 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
Section 455 which provides: (a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:16 pm by Orin Kerr
The first case is United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 10:22 am by Peter Margulies
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld a preliminary injunction in East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 9:09 am by The Federalist Society
-citizen parent to have ten years’ physical presence in the United States prior to the child’s birth, at least five of which were after attaining age 14. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:54 am by Steve Minor
State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 8:56 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, August 15, 2016 More Blog Entries: Who is Getting the Most from Social Security Disability? [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm
Filed: November 7, 2013 (unpublished)Opinion by: Judge Andre Davis Held: the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina was not clearly erroneous and did not abuse its discretion  in ruling that (1) the parties reached a binding and enforceable oral settlement agreement; and (2) plaintiff did not proceed in bad faith, so neither a dismissal with prejudice nor an award of attorney's fees was appropriate.Facts: Plaintiff made a $12… [read post]