Search for: "United States v. Herring" Results 2501 - 2520 of 23,686
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2022, 7:23 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
That is because federal law takes precedence over state laws. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Following the 2018 gov't shutdown, FBI employees sue the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:18 am by Frank Cranmer
Cite this article as: Frank Cranmer, "Social housing and religion again: LF v United Kingdom" in Law & Religion UK, 17 June 2022, https://lawandreligionuk.com/2022/06/17/social-housing-and-religion-again-lf-v-united-kingdom/ [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:45 am by John Ellis
On June 15, 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued its much anticipated decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 7:18 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
 The California Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s decision denying the motion to compel, and Viking River petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 7:18 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
 The California Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s decision denying the motion to compel, and Viking River petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Sherry F. Colb
Despite the fact that marital rape is now a crime throughout the United States (as of the early 1990's), you will not see many prosecutions for this crime unless major injuries beyond the rape itself are evident or the couple has already separated by the time of the crime. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 2:32 pm by Amy Howe
Saada was physically abusive to Golan throughout the couple’s marriage, eventually prompting her to take B.A.S. to the United States for a wedding. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 12:22 pm by Mark Ashton
Two years later, under the pretense of attending a wedding, Golan flew to the United States with the child and moved into a shelter in New York. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am by Bernard Bell
But, the panel observe, non-state plaintiffs were not entitled to the same solicitude. [read post]