Search for: "United States v. Jones" Results 2501 - 2520 of 3,382
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2010, 1:12 pm
Sykes of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit as the moderator. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:51 pm by Jim Dempsey
The brief was written by Andy Pincus, a former Assistant to the Solicitor General of the United States and one of the leading Supreme Court advocates today. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Blake & Anor v Fox [2024] EWHC 146 (KB). [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 1:16 pm by Robin Frazer Clark
  So, although the case came out correctly in the end, it took a review by the United States Supreme Court to get it right. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-8160, apparently involving the same issue as the already granted United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am by John Elwood
Riley, 14-1472, and Jones v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 1:04 pm
Remember, 18 million Americans used marijuana at least once in 1997.The extent to which drugs have permeated our community was noted by the Chief Judge of Florida's Third District court of Appeals back in 1991 when he wrote that trace amounts of cocaine may be found innocently on "almost everything in South Florida", Jones v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am by John Elwood
Biden, 22-1225Issues: (1) Whether the judgment below should be vacated and the case remanded for dismissal as moot under United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 1:52 pm
It is interesting to note that New Jersey's hate crime statute, as it then existed, was reviewed by the United States Supreme Court in the 2001 case of New Jersey v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:27 am
Oct. 15, 2008), a unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the summary judgment granted to Bayer by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, holding that Bayer’s settlement of patent litigation with a generic pharmaceutical manufacturer did not violate the antitrust laws. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:15 am by Eric Schweibenz
James Gildea issued the Initial Determination (“ID”) finding that Samsung had not violated Section 337 in connection with the importation into the United States, sale for importation, or sale within the United States after importation of certain multi-layer ceramic capacitors by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 29 October, Richard Spearman KC handed down judgment on a preliminary issue in the data protection claim of Joseph Pacini, Carsten Geyer -v- Dow Jones & Company Inc [2024] EWHC 2714 (KB). [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
New Zealand, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States had already banned the app. [read post]