Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 9,477
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2011, 1:49 pm
The Seventh Circuit’s opinion last week in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 1:34 pm
Moderator: Kelly Maser, United States Olympic Committee (United States) Ambush marketing: capitalizing on the excitement surrounding an event. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 7:23 pm
As we meet for these pretrial proceedings in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:12 pm
Self of Spencer, Indiana, infringed its rights in United States Trademark Registration Numbers 1,713,815, 4,912,172, 1,705,521, 2,868,784, 1,728,274, and 4,925,141 (collectively the “IU Marks”). [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 11:51 am
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 4:34 pm
Plaintiff itself acknowledged this crowded field in its application to the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO"). [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:20 am
PREPARED BY: Michael Chernicoff Looser Rules on Sentencing Stir Concerns About Equity [online.wsj.com] The Supreme Court cases of The United State v. [read post]
Precedential No. 18 (Part I): Fraud! TTAB Grants Petition to Cancel BLOOKE Registration for Bicycles
12 Aug 2024, 3:37 am
Great Concepts, LLC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 11:44 am
Christie v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 7:14 pm
" United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:34 am
[E]ven in the United States there appears to be several trade marks which incorporate the words “magic bra” and therefore even in the United States the term is common or descriptive….. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 6:19 pm
CPL 240.20(1)(h) requires the prosecutor disclose "Anything required to be disclosed, prior to trial, to the defendant by the prosecutor, pursuant to the constitution of this state or of the United States. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 9:35 pm
CAAF ruled 3-2 in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:00 am
(H.K.) v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:47 am
The Fashionista blog predicts that this is unlikely to be the end of the story, with a further appeal here and/or further proceedings in the United States unless the parties can use yesterday’s judgment to form the basis of a coexistence agreement. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
In Matal v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 10:32 pm
Siegal’s diet and certain of his intellectual property throughout the United States and Canada in exchange for a fee and royalties. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 12:01 pm
See e.g., United States v. [read post]
